Muslim women in the slums: poorest of the poor


A study of the maternity care and births in Mumbai slums

By Kashif-ul-Huda, TwoCircles.net,

A large number of Muslims of India live in poverty and they are the majority of the poorest of the poor living in slums. This is according to a study conducted in 2006 in Mumbai. The details of the study were published earlier this month.

Mumbai is home to millions of residents and more than half of them live in congested areas with virtually no civic services of any kind. These slums provide cheaper housing alternatives for people who migrated to Mumbai in search of better lives. People of different regions, speaking multiple languages, and observing various religious practices live side by side. A study published on June 5th, 2009 in International Journal for Equity in Health suggests that Muslims are overwhelmingly represented in these slums and also they are in general poorer than Hindus living in the same area.




TCN photo

The study was jointly conducted by Society for Nutrition, Education and Health Action (SNEHA), an NGO based in Mumbai, and Centre for International Health and Development (CIHD) of University College London.

The main finding of the study is that the population living in slums is not homogeneous and there are differences if population is divided based on various socio-economic factors. The researchers interviewed over five thousand mothers in 48 slum areas of Mumbai. Based on the detailed interviews they divided the women in four groups from least poor to most poor. These divisions were made on various factors including house ownership, type of construction, possession of ration card, source of electricity, type of toilet, etc.

The four groups thus generated were not artificial creations as clear trends were visible for various factors. Mothers belonging to the most poor groups are more likely to be a teenager, having lower literacy, and access to only public and shared water as opposed to the least poor group which is older, literate, and about a quarter of them access to water in their home. Most poor mothers also chose home or a public facility as the site of delivery while mothers belonging to the least poor group prefer private facility to deliver.

About 60% of slum dwellers own their home and though majority of the houses are permanent construction only 4% had toilet facility in them. Study also found that about a quarter of the women interviewed moved in their present residence within the last year, suggesting higher mobility but it also found 13% to be born in the houses they were living in suggesting that at least these families were not able to improve their economic condition in all these years.




Photo by renu parkhi

The study also found that the sex ratio was much lower than the national average. 882 females per 1000 males ratio was consistent among all four groups which is much lower than the national average of 933 females per 1000 males according to 2001 census.

Out of 5238 women that this study covered, 2411 or 46% of them were Muslims, 2480 (46.7%) were Hindus and 347 (7%) others. Higher percentages of Muslims were in the most poor of the four groups clustered according to various socio-economic factors.

Religion

Group 1 (most poor)

Group 2

Group 3

Group 4 (least poor)

Hindu

415 (32%)

600 (46%)

712 (54%)

753 (57%)

Muslim

858 (65%)

638 (49%)

474 (36%)

441(34%)

Other

36 (3%)

70 (5%)

126 (10%)

115 (9%)

Replying to queries by TwoCircles.net, David Osrin the corresponding author of the study agreed that the study is “fairly representative of established slum areas” of Mumbai. When asked about the data that shows that more Muslim women are in most poor groups Dr. Osirin explained that the data “suggests that there are greater proportions of Muslim women in the lower socioeconomic bands than in the higher bands. One could say that, in the most general sense, Muslim women seem to be poorer in the slum areas.”

As a part of this research CIHD is working with SNEHA and other women’s groups and health services to improve the health of women and children.

Neena Shah More, Ujwala Bapat, Sushmita Das, and Armida Fernandez of SNEHA and Anthony Costello and David Osrin of CIHD were researchers for this study.

Links:

http://www.equityhealthj.com/
http://www.ucl.ac.uk/cihd
http://www.snehamumbai.org/

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Head Scarf Killing and European Islamophobia

Head Scarf Killing and European Islamophobia

Some thousands of Egyptians surround the coffin of 32-year old pregnant Egyptian woman Marwa el-Sherbini, Monday July 6, 2009, who was stabbed by a German man in a courtroom in eastern Germany.
The murder of Marwa Sherbini, a veiled (and pregnant) Egyptian woman, as she prepared to give evidence in a German courtroom against a man who physically assaulted her, has incensed the Muslim World and re-ignited the debate over whether Europe is a truly tolerant society or one on the cusp of xenophobic extremism.

Muslims say the attitudes which prevailed in early 20th century European history and gave rise to the Holocaust are similar in nature to the climate of intimidation and violence Muslim communities must increasingly endure in contemporary Europe.

Today, Muslims in Europe are seen as existing outside of a democratic culture. A resurgence of social Darwinism as applied to libertarian theory--that democratic ideals are inherently superior to ideals of other cultures--has alienated Muslims and created a cultural backlash against them.

A hostile view of Islam began in the 8th century when Muslims expanded into the Iberian Peninsula. Islam was rejected as a fundamental religion and seen as a direct challenge to Christianity; Muslims were seen as heretics and their prophet a diabolical fraud.

In Dante Alighieri's Divine Comedy, considered the pinnacle of Western literature in the 13th century, the Prophet Muhammad and his cousin Ali are cast to the ninth circle of Hell--one created for schismatics and sowers of discord.

In Giovanni Da Modena's 1415 painting The Last Judgment, which adorns a cathedral in Bologna, the prophet is depicted as a scantily-clad, turbaned, and bearded man writhing in agony as he is pulled into hell by demons.

With Muslims' increased migration to Europe, fear of an Eastern culture in the midst of Western ideals dominated the discourse.

Soumayya Ghannoushi, a researcher in the history of ideas at the School of Oriental and African Studies at the University of London, believes:

"The medieval Christian view of Islam as a deviant, violent, licentious and heretical creed was secularized, stripped of its transcendental character and rearticulated within a modern essentialist philosophy that continues to define the terms of Western discourse on Islam, in its mainstream at least."
In 1997, the London-based Runnymede Charity published a report entitled "Islamophobia: A Challenge for Us All."

Updated in 2004, it found that Muslims were seen as the "other" and as lacking in values held by Western cultures. Islam was also seen as violent, aggressive, terroristic and inferior to Western ideals.

More importantly, hostility towards Islam is used to justify discriminatory practices towards Muslims and their exclusion from mainstream society, the report found.

In a final note of caution, the report also found that among Europeans anti-Muslim hostility is seen as natural or normal.

Such findings help explain why cartoons depicting the Prophet Muhammad published in the Danish Jyllands-Posten newspaper in 2006 should not be seen as experiments in journalistic freedoms; the cartoons were not borne in a vacuum.

The Jyllands-Posten cartoon depicting a bearded Prophet Muhammad with a bomb in his turban is suspiciously similar to a 1940's cartoon in the German Der Sturmer magazine which depicts a Jew as Satan.

Muhammad, a Muslim, and the Der Sturmer Jew are bearded. Both wear religious head garments, and both are depicted as icons of evil in contemporary society.

In the 20th and 21st centuries, Muslim communities in non-Islamic countries have come to fear the very pogroms which targeted the Jews in 1930s Europe.

Given the racism many Muslims endure in Europe, the murder of an Egyptian woman because she wore a hijab should not be dismissed as the act of a lone man who many are now calling insane.

Her murder comes amid increased media coverage of Muslims as outsiders unable to conform to Western ideologies, a growing anti-immigrant backlash in Europe, the resurgence of right-wing extremist groups even within the political establishments, and the decline in continental economic dividends. These must be seen as mutually inclusive.

While many countries around the world have enacted anti-hate speech laws and legislature to combat anti-Semitism, there is still no international consensus that equates Islamophobia with racism.

In its 2004 annual report, the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI) found that:

"Islamophobia continues to manifest itself in different guises. Muslim communities are the target of negative attitudes, and sometimes, violence and harassment. They suffer multiple forms of discrimination, including sometimes from certain public institutions. ECRI is worried about the current climate of hostility against persons who are or are believed to be Muslim."
There is, indeed, a cultural divide as ECRI points out:

"One of the new faces of racism today is "cultural" racism. According to this notion of racism, cultures are pre-defined entities, largely seen as homogenous, unchangeable and, more importantly, incompatible with each other."
Between 1939 and 1945, six million Jews were brutally gassed, burned and slaughtered by an intolerant, racist Nazi ideology which considered them to be untermenschen - inferiors.

This term is apt today to describe how some European extremist groups view Muslims.

In Mein Kamp, Hitler said of the Jews:

"Gradually I began to hate them. For me this was the time of the greatest spiritual upheaval I have ever gone through. I have ceased to be a weak-kneed cosmopolitan and have become an anti-Semite."
Jews around the world hold remembrance ceremonies of the Holocaust and say "never again."

Sherbini's death must not be in vain. It must now be reiterated that Muslim and non-Muslim leaders carefully face the great cultural gap that divides them - and breach it.

Muslim leaders must continue to emphasize the guiding principles of their faith - justice, tolerance, charity, compassion and equality - and speak out against honor killings, which are not uncommon among their communities in Europe.

European leaders must immediately condemn Sherbini's murder, hold her killer accountable, and acknowledge that Islamophobia is a growing threat.

Otherwise, Europe is precariously close to repeating the horrors of the past.

Math-Physics-Chem: Tuition Centres Need of the Hour.

Indian Muslims : School education is building the Pyramid from the bottom up. If the foundation is weak, the castle will collapse in one gust of strong wind.

There are 2 points on building a strong foundation :

1) Setting up Quality High Schools [this entails huge expense of establishing schools - land, building, infrastructure, furniture + running expenses viz. salaries, electricity, etc]. The community is poor. There is no segment that will come forward and take this task. The Govt. has no budget for this. All they offer is firming up the "identity politics". One mushaira per year + one iftar party. That is the Govt. strategy (state + centre). Inspite of the very best intentions of Prime Minister., i am sorry to say., that nothing concrete is expected on the ground. Ground reality will remain the same as is... and may only worsen with time. How to get the new kids into the school is a monumental challenge for the community and the Govt.

2) To improve what we have on hand. A bird in hand is worth 2 in the bush. Following the wisdom of that idiom, how to improve the student quality of the indian muslim students that we have on hand ? That is the question at hand. The answer is to strengthen the student that is presently studying, but is very weak in Math & Sciences. If leading members of the community can rise to the occasion... and establish Tuition Centres for Indian Muslim Students (minority institutions)., and approach respective municipal corporations to exempt them from Property Tax., and run these Tuition Centres on a no-loss, no-profit basis., or on minimum profit bases., i think that can change the face of the indian muslim student.

Remember : Matric is key and crucial. Once you improve the quality of a matriculate (X and +2 i.e. as the situation may emerge in the years to come); you have a strong nation. We have to strengthen the roots.

This is the task that must be done. Tuition centres that hire good Math / Science teachers that strengthen students giving them good idea of the CONCEPT. Getting marks and passing exam is not the motive. Strengthening the CONCEPT of Math and Science(s) is.

poverty and hijab

shame on those muslims who think that exposing the faces of their mothers.sisters and daughters would relieve them of poverty.MUSLIM S SHOULD BE GUTSY ENOUGH TO FEED THEIR FAMILY AND CHILDREN. Also dont expose these physically weak creatures to prying eyes of shaitan.Western countries have exploited women for the pleasure of man.now they are crying for dignity.

The Poverty of Muslims is glaring yet

The poverty of Indian Muslims is glaring and visible to the naked eye., but what about those who look thru the black prism of hatred. To them Muslims are "appeased". Look at the 5-Star life Indian Muslims are living. But they will never accept the reality., cuz they are on flying-chariots. They manufacture myths., and beileve in them. Such is their duality.

IN HIJAB, IT IS NOT COMPULSORY TO COVER FACE.

The backwardness of the community is mainly due to the backwardness of women.Women should come forward for social participation.Muslim organizations should come forward to empower women.Religious leaders also should become more liberal.For example, at least for the time being, there should be discouragement on the covering of face.It is not a part of compulsory hijab of Islam.It is only a sign of extra modesty.It is not required now.Muslim women are more empowered in regions where Shafi Madhhab is followed.For example,Kerala.In Kerala, it is not a tradition to cover the face due to liberal attitude of Shafi madhab in this matter.In Islam there is strong space for prioritization.NoW it is more important to escape from poverty, malnutrition and ignorance than the extra modesty by wearing this face-mask.Wearing face cover definitely has a negative role at this stage.When our community is more empowered and educated we can once more advocate the women to have more modesty.

modesty is more important than wealth

in the comment the anonymous writer has written that in this ager ti is more compulsary to escape form poverty than extra modesty. it seems that the writer gives more importane to money than to modesty.
of course poverty is a big porblerm faced by Muslims in today's world. but how did he coclude that only covering face is a hurdle in the way of financial growth? Modesty is somthing else and the matter of poverty is totally different from it.
moreover, in Islam, the responsibility of cattering to the needs ot the faimily goes to the shoulders of man not womamn. therefore, i humbaly request the writer not drive our women to the market, and eventually losing their modesty. of course educaiotn is compulsary for women, but it does not need to unviel their faces. rather a women can acqurie knowledge while covering thier faces also.
and also it is well to remember that covering face is a part of Hijab in Islam, becasue face of a women is the cente point of the body whihc attractes opposit sex. Yes! covering of face is not the part of Satr which is compulsary even is the presece of father and brother.

Hifzurahman, Do you believe

Hifzurahman,
Do you believe that we, those who follow Shafi madhab of Islam are doing against the laws of Islam?.In our school of thought, it is not compulsory to cover the face.It is considered only as an extra care for keeping modesty.Such extra care points are those points in Islam in which there is excuses.This is certainly an era of excuse for Muslim woman because due to low education and low employement whole generation of Muslims are suffering.
Majority of Muslim women in this world do not wear face dressing because they do not believe in strict Hanafi and Salafi madhabs.Please dont try to destruct the diversity inside Islam which is permitted by Qur-an and Sunnah.

face hijab

anonymous bhai,
Islam doesnot allow diversity inside it.Imam Shafi never dared to give preference to his viewpoint over any hadeeth(saheeh),rather he spoke strongly against it.That is his madhab.same applies to Imam Abu hanifa Imam malik,Imam Hanbal.
With this viewpoint if you are rigidly holding to any of the four shools of thought you are going against all four imams.
Now dont go to ask stupid ill informed muftis for guidance.Research in Quran and hadeeth(saheeh)directly.Quran and sunnah never mention any of the schools (all four),forget about permission.
HIJAB of face is indeed a compulsory in Islam whether you like it or not.Dont try to change pristine Islam rather change yourself.

Veil is not compulsory in

Veil is not compulsory in Islam.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

FREE REPRINTS

 Unless otherwise noted, you can republish our articles for free. You just have to credit TwoCircles.net and link it back to us, and you can’t edit our material or sell it separately. (We're licensed under Creative Commons, which provides the legal details.). For publishing TwoCircles.net photos please contact info@twocircles.net.