TCN cartoon: Babri Masjid
Submitted by admin on 15 June 2009 - 4:50pm
FREE REPRINTS
Unless otherwise noted, you can republish our articles for free. You just have to credit TwoCircles.net and link it back to us, and you can’t edit our material or sell it separately. (We're licensed under Creative Commons, which provides the legal details.). For publishing TwoCircles.net photos please contact info@twocircles.net.




Babri structure destined to
Babri structure destined to be destroyed ,ur allah wished so, so it happened. :)
re:The politicians of India in
You are so proud of Nizam and what he did,By the way have you ever heard of razakars of telangana region during the Nizam's rule,My grandfather was one of them who fought against Razakars,they were the people who raped our women,and slaughtered our men.you are saying politicians in india wrote the history inappropriately but what will be your answer when iam saying that i heard the actual events and facts from my own people.Now how Nizam thought that by doing all these he will win over the hearts of people of that region.The truth is they care a hell about the people.You are saying why muslim population is only 12% even after four marriages even after the invaders ruled india for 1000s of years the answer is india is highly populated and developed area by then,and common people like my grandfather also came out to fight the opression of these invaders apart from the other hindu kings of that time.and half of muslim population of india which accepted islam is because of the sufis,and their bhakthi marga.SO finally there is nothing great about these gold diggers(invaders).
I guess you are also not aware of the name changes of the places in most of the telangana area,The original hindu names of the villages and cities have been changed to islamic ones.Dont be so blind that you cant see the destruction caused by invaders.
I hope people should not come to conclusions about the structres built by the invaders as the only good things left in the history of india with the knwoledge imparted to them in madarassas.If you really want to know what great monuments and structures were there in india before your so called great muslm rulers, you have to read documents from the chinese visitors who recorded them before the invasions.
So regarding the demolition of the idols of Mecca you are saying its perfectly ok to break idols as they are man made.Here comes lion out of the sheep skin.I guess tomorrow when islam comes in to the power people like you will say its ok to destroy our temples because they are man made.You have opened my eyes,till now i used to oppose the people who talks of muslims in a bad light.but now on wards i guess i should support the people who ask for demolition of mosques and cleansing of muslims.if we dont do that ,you will do that to us.so its more now survival of the fittest.Thanks once again for opening my eyes.
dear brother you are talking
dear brother you are talking about hinduism so much no.....
do you know that what your sacred scriptures like bhagvad geetha,ramayana,upanishads,vedas..... all says against idol worship & it also says that the god is one, he has no image,...
1.
Common Concept of God in Hinduism:
Hinduism is commonly perceived as a polytheistic religion. Indeed, most Hindus would attest to this, by professing belief in multiple Gods. While some Hindus believe in the existence of three gods, some believe in thousands of gods, and some others in thirty three crore i.e. 330 million Gods. However, learned Hindus, who are well versed in their scriptures, insist that a Hindu should believe in and worship only one God.
The major difference between the Hindu and the Muslim perception of God is the common Hindus’ belief in the philosophy of Pantheism. Pantheism considers everything, living and non-living, to be Divine and Sacred. The common Hindu, therefore, considers everything as God. He considers the trees as God, the sun as God, the moon as God, the monkey as God, the snake as God and even human beings as manifestations of God!
Islam, on the contrary, exhorts man to consider himself and his surroundings as examples of Divine Creation rather than as divinity itself. Muslims therefore believe that everything is God’s i.e. the word ‘God’ with an apostrophe ‘s’. In other words the Muslims believe that everything belongs to God. The trees belong to God, the sun belongs to God, the moon belongs to God, the monkey belongs to God, the snake belongs to God, the human beings belong to God and everything in this universe belongs to God.
Thus the major difference between the Hindu and the Muslim beliefs is the difference of the apostrophe ‘s’. The Hindu says everything is God. The Muslim says everything is God’s.
2.
Concept of God according to Hindu Scriptures:
We can gain a better understanding of the concept of God in Hinduism by analysing Hindu scriptures.
BHAGAVAD GITA
The most popular amongst all the Hindu scriptures is the Bhagavad Gita.
Consider the following verse from the Gita:
“Those whose intelligence has been stolen by material desires surrender unto demigods and follow the particular rules and regulations of worship according to their own natures.”
[Bhagavad Gita 7:20]
The Gita states that people who are materialistic worship demigods i.e. ‘gods’ besides the True God.
UPANISHADS:
The Upanishads are considered sacred scriptures by the Hindus.
The following verses from the Upanishads refer to the Concept of God:
1.
“Ekam evadvitiyam”
“He is One only without a second.”
[Chandogya Upanishad 6:2:1]1
2.
“Na casya kascij janita na cadhipah.”
“Of Him there are neither parents nor lord.”
[Svetasvatara Upanishad 6:9]2
3.
“Na tasya pratima asti”
“There is no likeness of Him.”
[Svetasvatara Upanishad 4:19]3
4.
The following verses from the Upanishad allude to the inability of man to imagine God in a particular form:
“Na samdrse tisthati rupam asya, na caksusa pasyati kas canainam.”
“His form is not to be seen; no one sees Him with the eye.”
[Svetasvatara Upanishad 4:20]4
1[The Principal Upanishad by S. Radhakrishnan page 447 and 448]
[Sacred Books of the East, volume 1 ‘The Upanishads part I’ page 93]
2[The Principal Upanishad by S. Radhakrishnan page 745]
[Sacred Books of the East, volume 15, ‘The Upanishads part II’ page 263.]
3[The Principal Upanishad by S. Radhakrishnan page 736 & 737]
[Sacred Books of the East, volume 15, ‘The Upanishads part II’ page no 253]
4[The Principal Upanishad by S. Radhakrishnan page 737]
[Sacred Books of the East, volume 15, ‘The Upanishads part II’ page no 253]
THE VEDAS
Vedas are considered the most sacred of all the Hindu scriptures. There are four principal Vedas: Rigveda, Yajurveda, Samveda and Atharvaveda.
1. Yajurveda
The following verses from the Yajurveda echo a similar concept of God:
1.
“na tasya pratima asti
“There is no image of Him.”
[Yajurveda 32:3]5
2.
“shudhama poapvidham”
“He is bodyless and pure.”
[Yajurveda 40:8]6
3.
“Andhatama pravishanti ye asambhuti mupaste”
“They enter darkness, those who worship the natural elements” (Air, Water, Fire, etc.). “They sink deeper in darkness, those who worship sambhuti.”
[Yajurveda 40:9]7
Sambhuti means created things, for example table, chair, idol, etc.
4.
The Yajurveda contains the following prayer:
“Lead us to the good path and remove the sin that makes us stray and wander.”
[Yajurveda 40:16]8
5[Yajurveda by Devi Chand M.A. page 377]
6[Yajurveda Samhita by Ralph T. H. Giffith page 538]
7[Yajurveda Samhita by Ralph T. H. Giffith page 538]
8[Yajurveda Samhita by Ralph T. H. Griffith page 541]
2. Atharvaveda
The Atharvaveda praises God in Book 20, hymn 58 and verse 3:
1. “Dev maha osi”
“God is verily great”
[Atharvaveda 20:58:3]9
3. Rigveda
1.
The oldest of all the vedas is Rigveda. It is also the one considered most sacred by the Hindus. The Rigveda states in Book 1, hymn 164 and verse 46:
“Sages (learned Priests) call one God by many names.”
[Rigveda 1:164:46]
2.
The Rigveda gives several different attributes to Almighty God. Many of these are mentioned in Rigveda Book 2 hymn 1.
Among the various attributes of God, one of the beautiful attributes mentioned in the Rigveda Book II hymn 1 verse 3, is Brahma. Brahma means ‘The Creator’. Translated into Arabic it means Khaaliq. Muslims can have no objection if Almighty God is referred to as Khaaliq or ‘Creator’ or Brahma. However if it is said that Brahma is Almighty God who has four heads with each head having a crown, Muslims take strong exception to it.
Describing Almighty God in anthropomorphic terms also goes against the following verse of Yajurveda:
“Na tasya Pratima asti”
“There is no image of Him.”
[Yajurveda 32:3]
Another beautiful attribute of God mentioned in the Rigveda Book II hymn 1 verse 3 is Vishnu. Vishnu means ‘The Sustainer’. Translated into Arabic it means Rabb. Again, Muslims can have no objection if Almighty God is referred to as Rabb or ‘Sustainer’ or Vishnu. But the popular image of
9[Atharveda Samhita vol 2 William Dwight Whitney page 910]
Vishnu among Hindus, is that of a God who has four arms, with one of the right arms holding the Chakra, i.e. a discus and one of the left arms holding a ‘conch shell’, or riding a bird or reclining on a snake couch. Muslims can never accept any image of God. As mentioned earlier this also goes against Svetasvatara Upanishad Chapter 4 verse 19.
“Na tasya pratima asti”
“There is no likeness of Him”
The following verse from the Rigveda Book 8, hymn 1, verse 1 refer to the Unity and Glory of the Supreme Being:
3.
“Ma cid anyad vi sansata sakhayo ma rishanyata”
“O friends, do not worship anybody but Him, the Divine One. Praise Him alone.”
[Rigveda 8:1:1]10
4.
“Devasya samituk parishtutih”
“Verily, great is the glory of the Divine Creator.”
[Rigveda 5:1:81]11
Brahma Sutra of Hinduism:
The Brahma Sutra of Hinduism is:
“Ekam Brahm, dvitiya naste neh na naste kinchan”
“There is only one God, not the second; not at all, not at all, not in the least bit.”
Thus only a dispassionate study of the Hindu scriptures can help one understand the concept of God in Hinduism.
0[Rigveda Samhita vol. 9, pages 2810 and 2811 by Swami Satya Prakash Sarasvati and Satyakam Vidyalankar]
11[Rigveda Samhita vol. 6, pages 1802 and 1803 by Swami Satya Prakash Saraswati and Satyakam Vidyalankar]
as from the sun.” The Prophecy confirms:
1.
The name of the Prophet as Ahmed since Ahmed is an Arabic name. Many translators misunderstood it to be ‘Ahm at hi’ and translated the mantra as “I alone have acquired the real wisdom of my father”.
2.
Prophet was given eternal law, i.e. the Shariah.
3.
The Rishi was enlightened by the Shariah of Prophet Muhammad. The Qur’an says in Surah Saba Chapter 34 verse 28 (34:28):
“We have not sent thee but as a universal (Messenger) to men, giving them glad tidings and warning them (against sin), but most men understand not.”
If fact muslims follows hindu rituals at KABA ASHEK
1)How hindukush mountain exist near kandhahar?? How kandahar word came from gandhar?? How budhaa statues found in taliban & afaganisthan??
2) Rituals followed in kaba ashek (HAJ) are also hindu rituals only
3) Why muslims shave their heads, like ritual followed by many hindus in temples eg Shri Tirupathi Balaji temple,Andhra Pradesh??
4) Why muslims do saptapadi pradakshina around kaba ashek, like hindu do in their temples. Why seven rounds or saptapadi why not less or greater than this??
5) Why muslims wear clean white dhoti and shawl, like hindus wear this sowale before performing pujas in temple.
5) Zam zam well, zam zam word is sanskrit word means holy water (Song -Megha zam zam barasat re).Why muslim do abhishekam ie sprinkle zam zam water on kabaeshwar is kaba ashek?
6) Why this water is taken in bottles with them by muslim piligrims like hindu take tirth or ganga jal after visiting holy place?
7) If muslims dont worship idols then why kaba ashek rock like shiv ling is worshipped?
8) There were 360 images of kaaba why these has been destroyed??
8) Asek has come from sanskrit word a-shwet= black, kaba means shiv =kabeshwar shiv temples still present in karantaka pls visit same rituals followed there also.
FACT IS KABA ASHEK IS SHIV TEMPLE IE KABESHWAR ASHWET MADE IN VIKRAMADITYA ERA (page no 315, Sayar-ul-Okul, treasured in the Makhtab-e-sultania library in istanbul) & MUSLIM FOLLOWS HINDU RITUALS THERE!!!
Why mulism dont follow this rituals in any other mosque all over the world but hindus follow this in temples all over the world??
If possible,pls answer above questions BUT TO THE POINT ONLY
to two circles
You seem to be publishing the comments only when some body replies in rage and anger from hindus side,like it happend in my case,when i geve a very sane explanation why i dont think both religions are not same you did not publish it.i hope my last two comments are published.
to umar
Oh great.... Islam never advises to demolish the any other faith's preaching area, I guess you have no knowledge of Islam.Islam is found only on those principles,Starting with Abraham(father of monotheism as mentioned in Quran) who broke the idols worshipped by others,followed by Mohammed who did it again after conquering Mecca by removing the idols in Kaba which was the worshipping place of the people who were inhabitating there at the first place.
I guess your reply will be kaba was the place which belonged to monotheists and was occupied by idol worshippers.Here your brother rahulamin will not ask for proof whether it really belonged to monothiests like in the case of ayodya whether ram was born there and whether there was temple?No,he will blindly accepts it.
The problem is logic used for judging the other religion is missing when it comes to judging your own religion.Dear, God doesn't need to upgrade religion like we human upgrade computer applications ,that we find bugs and fix it with every release.This is human way of thinking.come out of darkness.
You say it is not wise for a ruler to plunder other's relegious feelings, you are right if the ruler was anyone other than muslim. Why because if you read the history of islam you will find out.Islam tries to bring the peace with war and fight as "really" as the concept of love and affection can be taught to other by beating them,calling them names.
to rahul amin
rahul amin,
Do you think anyone cares the shit if you pray the true creator/mohammed or arabs?
people worship idols sitting on cows and animals because they don't doubt the capability and power of god to take any shape and form like you guys who have all the doubts in the world that no, God/true creator cant take a form,even of he takes i don't know whether at that point of time i should worship him in that way because my prophet said so and so.Its shameful that some brains have so limited capability to understand higher concepts like God and his power.Their life is limited to calling others idol worshippers(giving them some ego boost without which it is unlikely that they can function normally),kaffirs,infidels.
A little clarification... By the way did your father was there when mohammed got revelation from ghost/devil.i am thankful that my values dont preach me to hate other person just because they percieve the god in a different way than mine.For your tiny little mind its difficult.You asked me to read babarnama,i ask you to read the Persian books on him to know more about that nice person ok.
I am not against Muslims as persons ,but I am really against their ideology which gives them the right to call others as wrong only them as people following the right path.I dont care which is the first one mandir or masjid, I want people to use that land for an orphanage/hospital for the people from all the faiths.
A muslim should stop idolising the invaders,yes i call them invaders because they came with weapons and force not asking a permission to settle in the land.Try to accept the truth.Hindus should stop politicizing religion and should go for peaceful ways like negotiation.But i guess it is impossible as long as the other party calls you infidel,idol worshipper.
till date i have not
till date i have not understood one fact how muslims consider a masjid which was errected by an invader(read babar) who looted,raped and oppressed then indian people as sacred and worshipping place.Is this what islam stands for?is this what muslims stand for?
important clarification!
dear reader
babri masjid is as sacred as any other masjid bcoz unlike a temple where people worship idols sitting on cows & other animals,we muslims worship the true creator.and babri masjid is only named after babar,he is not worshipped by us in that mosque.and was your father present there to see what babar did to indians after coming to india?it is true that some muslim rulers tried to convert by force,but blaming the whole community for the actions of one person is absurd.do you blame all christians for the actions of hitler & bush?similarly nobody should blame islam for what osama has done.and why do hindus think babri masjid was built after destroying a temple?what is the proof that ram was born at the same place where babri masjid was built,& there was a temple before that.why the hindus didn't oppose when the temple of ram was being destroyed?why no historian has ever written about the destruction of the temple anywhere?and where is the palace of king ram in ayodhya?if ram was born in ayodhya,itdoesn't mean u make the whole city a temple & destroy a mosque!
Reply
A good question....
but tell me one thing"what do you mean by an invader",was Babar an invader,were ARYANS invaders who looted,oppressed,raped the true Dravidian inheritors of the land.
These people were settlers who came to the rich land of India to live in it,not to plunder it.Babar was a very noble man,an intellectual,writer,philosopher,great soldier(read Babur nama for more info),no one so obnoxiously characterized as rapist, couldn't have written a great memoir.
As for the mosque,Babri masjid was never built on a temple,it couldn't be that way cause Islam prohibits demolishing any other faiths preaching area.He could'nt have done that,cause he wanted to rule here,any wise person would'nt do so by plundering religious feelings of the indigenous people.
A fool would know all this.
Umar
Very Boring Reply Indeed
Dear Anonymous,
Whether Babri Masjid was built on a temple or not let the time conclude it . However you saying "Babri Masjid was never built on a temple because Islam prohibits demolishing any other faiths preaching area" is a very boring explanation, it is as if believing that no Muslim consumes liquor as Holy Quran prohibits it, no Muslim involve in rape as it is not supported in Islam, no Muslim or kill the others because it is prohibited in Islam etc. Dear sir nothing is happening according to religion in this world. If it is happening so then there would not have been any need of Courts and Police Stations in Islamic Countries. People only do things as for their convenience hence saying that Babar or any Muslim kings did not demolished any temples in India (say Kashi,Mathura,Somnath, and endless list of this kind of constructions in India and more recently the Giant Buddha statue in Kandhhar) is not a wiser argument.
Temples were demolished in History and similarly there are recorded incidents of Hindu kings demolishing Buddhist or Jain temples. As we can not redo the history, as true citizen of the nation we shall only try to arrive at mutual agreement to re-construct such demolished places of worship which hold emotional importance to a particular community. As far as Babri is consider I believe that what Sangh Parivar done is squarely wrong it should have patience and should wait for convincing the Muslim brothers to let them construct a temple and if Muslim brothers did not agree to it then they should have left it for the next generations to decide I don't understand why were they in a hurry to construct a temple there (which any way did not happen till day and may perhaps never happen in this generation) by demolishing Babri Masjid. We can not simply imitate the likes of Ghajani, Aurangjeb or Babar etc. in 20th century as we are more responsible people today than we were in 16th or 17th centuries.
And my advise to my dear Anonymous brother please do not live in a dreaming world and think things are not done or not being done by Muslims out of the syllabus (of Holy Quran). If Muslims are strictly living according to the dos and don’t of Quran then where is the need of Police Stations of Courts in Islamic Countries? Well if you decide to call a person a Muslim only if he/she strictly confine to the preaching of Islam, then I am afraid that the world may be left with less than a few lakhs of Muslims out of the crores of Muslim population in the world.
The politicians of India in
The politicians of India in 20th and in 21st Centuries used the religious divide to rule India for their own vested interests.They left the landmarks be it roads, bridges, shelter for poor people and Mosque even allocating lands and trust for Hindu Temples never named any thing behind then and for name sake to be remembered with their names! Babri Masjid was built during the era of Babur but for hate mechanism of Sangh Gang the name it 'Babri Masjid' and alongside went on orchestrated campaign that 'Babur' was 'invader. Why the GT Road is not name as Sher Shah Suri Road! No Muslim invader arrived in South India so where are the heritages of Temples, Bridges, Roads, Gardens, public utility services like Nizam in Hyderabad, Tipu Sultan in Mysore and Aurnazeb 'the Muslim 'invader' left many monuments. Why no Hindu King made lakes like NIZAM did to collect the rainwater as a reservoir and in last two hundred year people in Hyderabad and surrounding areas are surviving with 'USMAN SAGAR', 'HIMAYAT SAGAR' etc. Even the modern India with lot of advancement, in scarcity of water failed the foresightedness of Nizam for water reservoir to preserve the rain water.
So the invader 'Babur' demolished the temple and then made a Masjid! Why in plenty of space made available that time, he preferred to first demolish the temple and then Masjid? Was he insane that he is the 'invader' and by demolishing the temple, will he win the heart of majority Hindus to rule India.
As regard to earlier questions why 'idols' were broken in Makkah. The answer is simple. The idols are made by men and God has made every thing for human being so better to worship the Creator and not the 'creators' of idols. The to whom Hindus approach for blessings, dont hear not the can protect themselves.
But Muslims are very clearly prohibited not to do disrespect of any other faiths and beliefs and this is the reason that we don't reply in 'tit for tat' manner as many Hindus, Christians and other, some time cross the limit of respect of our Islamic beliefs avoid to respond otherwise we can easily ridicule others faith.
Here I come to conclude with such non sense that Babur' Muslim rulers and Muslims raped the Hindu women. All non sense and hate propaganda. I admit that every Muslim is not pious and sometime they also commit heinous crime on which as per QURA'N the should be hanged to death. I suggest all my brother and sisters from other faith including Muslim to read Holy Qura'an the teaching of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH), the last messenger of God to humanities who was a sent by God, the lone and only creator of Universe as 'GIFT TO ALL HUMANITIES' not confined to Muslims alone!
Majority of our Hindu Brothers misguided by distorted and unauthentic history refers to Muslim ruler of five hundred years falsely accusing that Muslim ruler were rapists, murders, temple destroyers and forcefully converted Hindu to the fold of Islam. Why come till to date even after marrying 'four times' Muslims have only 12% populations in India? Why a section of communal Hindus don't discuss that in last 60 years, who has been raping Muslims, Christians and Dalits women in every part of India? How many Muslims and other minorities are killed by 'political parties' to rule India. WHY DON'T YOU DISCUSS THE CURRENT HISTORY WHICH MANY OF US FRESH MEMORIES. Who is raping whom? Are all the rapists and murders are Muslims or the reverse of it?
deobandis are spreading jihad and not barelvis in india.
Zakir is spreading wahabbism ideology in india & has been sposored by soudi arabia for the same. He always supports jihad and osamabin laden.Thats why many barelvis have issued fatawa against him even in sunni dawate islam gathering in mumbai.More appropiate word than terrorist is indigenised jihad In most of the blast in india since 1993 all jihadis has been arrested belongs to two tanzeems 1) deobandi tabligh jammat & 2) alhe hadith.These two tanzeems are nothing but followers of wahabbis ideology in india.These two groups are spreading radical islam.Why muslim will kill muslims in bomb blast in jaipur,bangalore, mumbai ,ahemadabad,surat, delhi?? Ansnwer is these deobandis followed the ideology which is different from barelvis & India is barelvi majority country which follows different ideology & go to dargah & trust on saint as mediator to allah.They are not involved in terrorist activities.All the jihadi group in asia like huji, let, muslim defence force,al badr follows deobandi ideology taliban is also deobandi majority jihadi nation, mushraff hinself is deobandi In india this is nothing but ideological war.Lets come together to stop talibanisation of india
Post new comment