Rajasthan: Hungama over circumcision

By Dr. M. Iqbal Siddiqui

There was an ambiance of festival in the village Shivnagri in Beawar region of Ajmer district in Rajasthan. About 40 boys, belonging to the Cheeta-Mehrat-Kathat clan were circumcised. Among them were Rahul and Akash, grand Children of Mangi Lal Kathat. He was happy and thanking Allah for granting him this opportunity.

But just after two days, police raided his house and arrested him and his wife Sakina under sections 307 (attempt to murder), 320 (inflicting severe injury) and 395-A (hurting religious feelings). Maulana Gheesu Khan who performed the khatna (circumcision), was also arrested from his village Shivnagri.

The Cheeta-Mehrat-Kathat, collectively called the Kathats, have their roots in the Chauhan dynasty. In 10th century AD, Anup and Anhal, sons of the Chauhan ruler Lakhan Singh ousted the ruling Gurjars from the area and established the Chauhan kingdom making ‘Chang’ their capital. In Anhal’s 24th generation, born Har Raj and Bal Raj who embraced Islam in 1393 AD.




Kathat had lived with their dual identify of Hindu and Muslim for centuries [Photo by Yogi Sikand, TCN]

The Muslim emperor Alauddeen Khilji honored Har Raj with the title of ‘Kaathaa’, means ‘The Strong’, due to his outstanding bravery. His descendents were called the Kathats. The descendents of Bal Raj, who were later called Rawats (or Barads), deviated from Islam and reverted to the religion of their forefathers after about 150 years. Due to the lack of education and ignorance most of the Kathats who decided to remain Muslims, didn’t practice Islamic traditions. But there were some practices of Islam that kept them Muslims for seven hundred years- burial of their deceased, eating halal meat and khatna (circumcision). Even today they have both Hindu and Muslim names in the same family. Therefore Mangi Lal was also having his name and his son Rajesh and grandsons Rahul and Akash, though all are Muslims.

Mangi Lal, for a long period kept himself away from Islam and portrayed himself as a Hindu. He also became district level office bearer of the VHP. When his wife died a few years ago, he prepared to bury her according to the custom of his clan. On this a conflict arose between him and his VHP friends, but he insisted on following the custom. On this point, he separated himself from the VHP and declared in a ceremony that now he is a Muslim and will remain Muslim for rest of his life. He remarried after some time with a Muslim woman Sakina. He was much worried now for his children’s Muslim Identity and wanted his grand sons to be circumcised. He discussed the matter with his son and daughter in law who agreed for the ceremony in the name of tradition. When the day of the Khatna Ceremony came, his son and his wife went to Jaipur for some work. Grand father took his grandsons with him to Shivnagri where the ceremony took place and circumcision performed.

Only after two days, his son Rajesh Kathat, working in Indian Navy at Mumbai, and brought up in a Hindu environment, lodged an FIR against his father, step mother and Maulana Gheesu Kahn who perfomed the khatna, alleging them of circumcising his children without his permission and ‘converting’ them to Islam.

According to Mangu Khan Kathat, the president of the Cheeta-Mehrat-Kathat Mahasabha, Mangi Lal’s second wife Sakina has brought her son Qamruddeen born of her previous husband, now the in-laws of Rajesh told him that his father would give away all of his property to his wife’s son hence he must act against him and this was high time. Thus, he said Rajesh lodged FIR against his father though the circumcision was done after his and his wife’s due consent.

The office bearers of the Cheeta-Mehrat-Kathat Mahasabha held a press conference in Jaipur and told media men that they were Muslims since past seven hundred years and it was the tradition of their tribe to circumcise their boys. He wondered from where the question of conversion arises when Muslims get their boys circumcised. He and other office bearers of the Mahasabha told news persons that this was solely their family matter and no other person or organization has any right to interfere therein.

When he was to be produced before the magistrate at Beawar court, VHP and Shiv Sena activists gathered in large number and began shouting slogans against Mangi Lal. Meanwhile, when a youth Bhanwaru Kathat came and consoled him and said not to worry everything will be ok, the activists of these fascist organizations chased after him. Instead of saving him from the goons, the police arrested Bhanwaru Kathat under section 151 (shattering peace). Another unpleasant thing that occurred was that the bar association of Beawar declared that no lawyer will take up Mangi Lal Kthat’s case. The Cheeta-Mehrat-Kathat Mahasabha hired a lawyer from Ajmer.

Mangi Lal Kathat is now in judicial custody, let us see if truth and justice will prevail or communalism and fascism will take over them.

Link:

The Kathat story

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Reply by a Katahat himself

Hi friends, i am a Kathat Myself, the writer of the article has written correct history for most part but he was not perfectly right, the version till Harraj and Balraj is right( actually it was not bal raj, it was Gaj Raj Chauhan), these two brothers used to collect tax from a pass in their kingdom, they became friends with a minister of Allaudin Khilji who used to travel from that pass, that minister Narrated the tales of the two brother's bravery to the sultan who summoned them and appointed the two Thakurs the commanders of the unit responsible for sultans safty, or his body guards so to say....after a while, he was so impressed by these two brothers bravery that he awarded them the titles of Katha(to harraj meaning strong) and Ghoda to Gajraj( as he was a great rider), The sultan wanted these two brothers to convert to muslims as with them he would get two great loyal commanders,But Harraj and Gajraj both refrained, as they had taken an oath to be loyal to the Sultan they accepted three traditions of muslims, just the three traditions, they never accepted Islam, these traditions were burial, circumsisiion and eating Halal meat, Gajraj could not bear this for long and he returned to Ajmer and never followed any of these traditions , his descendents were called Ghodawats,Harraj too returned but he could not break his oath, his descendents were called Kathats and continued practicing the three traditions which honestly speaking i am ashamed of, bcaz of this we have lost our identity as Thakurs, though bards still visit our villages and narate the tales of the bravery of our ancestors and still refer us as thakursaa, Kunwarsaa etc, but in the outside world and to the other Rajputs we are seen just as a local tribe, Rawats are much better off as they have their dignity left...

Hungama over circumcision

This view only favours grandfathers unjustifiable actions which are not morally right. Both boys were subjected to inhuman pain for grandfathers satisfaction only.

RSS is a terrorist body

If you bring to light the injustices meted out on Indian Muslims, you are "communal". Lata Mangeshkar is "secular" in the truest sense of the word ! haha. Look at her life- 85 years - all of those 85 yrs spent in hating Islam and Muslims. She literally lived "hatred for Muslims". But yet, she is "secular"; a very good indian citizen. Everyone knows the facts but... But if some Muslim person talks about the injustices meted out on his community... he is communal. A Pakistani spy / an ISI agent / a terrorist / with links to the Mafia and the "D" Gang. Basically, there is pressure on muslim leadership to remain silent. The moment you expose the truth, you will be branded a Pakistani spy and an ISI Agent. "Call someone a dog and kill him" - that is the strategy. In the end it will lead to civil war in India... but thats what the RSS has been wanting since 1926. In 1947, they played Part-I of the drama. Now they want a final and decisive Part-II of the sequel. Basically RSS & its hate-tentacles want to go for ethnic cleansing... All preparation is towards that final goal.

Let them Decide their Ideologies

How it become such a big issue. They are Indians and they are Free to choose their religion.

Why should the police or court interfere in this case? Indian Constitution is based on secularism. President of India should interfere this case and hpheld the rights of Indians based on the constitution. PRATHIBA

reply to prathiba

Dear Pratibha

your comments is not as per your point of view about the rights of one as Indian to choose their wish of religion.
Here this incident is entiry diffrents as Grandfather took a disision for the Khatna of his Granchildren without concent of their parents under the influence of his new wife. Matter of property is not the point as legaly the property is belongs to son birth by his first wife only.
how one dadaji can go for a such step without concents of parents. its the matter of life for the kids. Their names shows that they are following hindu system(Mangilal, Rajesh, Akash & Rahul. Only one name appear as Muslim and that is Sakeena, second wife of ML. So if the person desids himself to follow the Muslim Dharm in its age of 50+ under the influence of his new wife, it ok for him and i have no objection as i respect the right he gained as Indian but he has no right to pull his son and grand sons.

that is why Beawar bar council decides to not to defend that person.

remember: Religon is personnel matter and one should respect for each rligion than why to force some one.

hope u can understan my point of view

Now Prathiba will not reply

Prthibha likes to speak in thin air. When confronted with the actual facts that it was the grand father who tried to convert the children without the consent of the parents - there would be silence from Prathibha.

Comment

Mr editor, the tone and tenor of this piece is hardly that of a 'news item'. It is blatantly one-sided. The author ascribes motives and aspersions with no sense of evenness. Please avoid such stuff if you wish to retain your credibility.

Nothing New

Dear Sanjeev,

There is nothing new in it, this site has the unique distinction of publishing such stuff which is of purely one sided in nature. I wish TC.Net start would take ample care in publishing articles like this and if they want to make it a news item then they should atleast take the minimum care of publishing the other opinion also for the favor of the readers.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

FREE REPRINTS

 Unless otherwise noted, you can republish our articles for free. You just have to credit TwoCircles.net and link it back to us, and you can’t edit our material or sell it separately. (We're licensed under Creative Commons, which provides the legal details.). For publishing TwoCircles.net photos please contact info@twocircles.net.