Gita: Not a Religious book?
By Ram Puniyani
Srimad Bhagwat Gita or Bhagwat Gita or Gita has been in the news recently for various reasons. Few months ago, the matter came up when a Siberian Court in the Tomsk City of Russia was to decide about the ban on the translation of Gita by Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupad Swami, the founder of ISKCON. The argument was that this particular translation was promoting social discord and so be banned. It was perceived in India as if there is a demand for ban on Gita in Russia. In this context the matter came up in the parliament and a strong protest was voiced against banning of Hindu religious text. Later the court did not ban this particular translation and so the matters came to rest there. Incidentally it can be reemphasized that Gita as a Hindu religious scripture is prevalent in Russia from centuries, and what was being demanded was a ban on particular translation and not on the Holy Scripture as such.
Closer home, the M. P. High court has ruled (Jan 2012) that “Gita is essentially a book on Indian philosophy, not book on Indian religion”. This judgment gave a sanction on the decision of M.P. Government to continue with the teaching of Gita Sar (Essence of Gita) in the MP schools. This petition had come up in the court when the Catholic Bishop Council appealed that moral values of all religions should be taught in schools and not just Gita. So now the M.P. High Court has concluded that since Gita is a book on Indian Philosophy and not on religion, it can be continued as such and the demand to consider introducing the moral values from other religions as well, need not be considered. Incidentally other BJP ruled state; Karnataka is also planning to introduce the teaching of Gita in its schools. While giving this judgment, one wonders if the honourable judge forgot that while the oath is administered to Hindus in his court, they are made to do take oath by keeping their hand on the same Holy book, as a religious book not for its philosophy!
One is reminded of another judgment at this time, the one known as “Hindutva as a way of life”. The Supreme Court was to decide whether the use of the word Hindutva in elections tantamount to corrupt electoral practices or not, as Hindutva divides people along religious lines. Contrary to the theological, sociological and political understanding that Hinduism is a religion and that the word Hindutva is built around Hindu religious identity, Court ruled something which opened the floodgates of dividing people along religious lines. This judgment ‘Hindutva is a way of life’ exonerated someone who was doing divisive religious propaganda and gave legitimacy to the politics in the name of religion. Now the Gita judgment has again raised the questions about the nature of Hinduism, its religious texts and its religious belief.
Opportunistically the MP government and other Hindutva ideologues who called Gita as a holy Hindu religious scripture, and so needs to be taught in schools are keeping quiet, as this judgment suits their political agenda. The confusions prevail at multiple layers, as Hinduism is not a prophet based religion and there is no single 'revealed holy book’ this understanding is being used by many to take the convenient path of taking the meaning which suits their purpose.
While term Hindu is of late origin, eighth century, the consolidation of Hinduism from the various prevailing religious sects has been a process beginning around that time with Magadh Mauryan empire. There are many a religious scriptures, many a holy books in this umbrella of Hinduism, Vedas, Upanishads, Ramayana, Mahabharata etc. So which is the holy scripture of Hindus? While all these books are regarded as Holy, over a period of time Hindu religion is being shaped around, One Deity (Lord Ram), One Book (Gita), One Clergy (Acharyas, Mahants). The verdict of the court defies logic when it proclaims, “Gita is essentially a book on Indian philosophy not book on Indian religion.”
The Bhagwat Gita or Gita (Song of God) is a 700 verse scripture that is part of the epic Mahabharata. As it is drawn from Mahabharata it can be labelled as Smriti text. Some sects of Hinduism give it the status of Upanishad, thereby making it sruti (revealed) book. It is also regarded to represent the summary of Upanishadic teachings and so it is also called as ‘Upanishad of Upanishads’. In this Holy Scripture Lord Krishna teaches Arjun about his duties as a Prince belonging to Kshatriya Varna. Arjun was faced with the dilemma of the war, the possibility of killing his own kin, cousins and others. Lord tells Arjun that it is his holy duty to undertake the war. Lord elaborates on different Yogas and so Gita is often described as a core of Hindu theology. As most holy scriptures are the revelations from the supreme God, in Gita also Krishna reveals his identity as Supreme Being himself (Svayam Bhagvan). He blesses Arjun with the awe inspiring vision of divine universal form.
The Gita elaborates on the central part of Hindu theology, the origin of Varnas. In Purush Sukta of Vedas Lord Brahma narrates as to how he created four Varnas from the body of Virat Purush. In Gita on similar lines Lord Krishna also tells about the divine origin of Varna’s. Lord says that the fourfold order was created by him according to the divisions of quality (Guna) and work (karma).
One knows that origin of Hinduism is different from the Prophet based religions. Here there has been an evolution of the Hinduism over a period of time and today while Hinduism is a religion, Gita is its Holy Scripture. To take the stand that it is Indian philosophy and not religious one is far from truth. There is philosophy also in many a Holy Scriptures. Notwithstanding that, they are primarily religious scriptures. The verdict of the court needs re-examination as it is not conforming to the belief of millions of Hindus; neither can it stand the scrutiny of rational understanding about Hinduism as a religion. From the religion of Pastoral Aryans to the practices of Hindus today, there is a long journey. The communal forces want to introduce this text in schools as not only they want to impose Hindu nation in this country but also through this book, they aim to reinforce the concept of Varna, which is one of the core doctrine of Hinduism, and Gita tells this by attributing Varna to the divine creation by Lord Himself. While there are many a philosophical formulations in this divine book there is also the subtle defence of what the Hindutva politics wants to bring in today, Varna- Jati in a repackaged form.
FREE REPRINTS
Unless otherwise noted, you can republish our articles for free. You just have to credit TwoCircles.net and link it back to us, and you can’t edit our material or sell it separately. (We're licensed under Creative Commons, which provides the legal details.). For publishing TwoCircles.net photos please contact info@twocircles.net.

Abusaleh Shariff explodes the myth of Muslims doing better under Modi rule


Vedas
Namaste !
So Gita is a guide book for spritual journy of the Soul. As. In line with any other unibersal scriptute as true Vaishnave follows. So Gita is way of life as well as God in His Recorded conversetion for Humanity at large tp serve Him & love Hom with our orognal teletionship. So its Golden pricipus science of the Soul & Supetsoul & Supteme Personality of Gpdhead Lord Shree Krishna Himself.---Krshna stu Bhagavan svayam.
mr rampuniyani....if whatever
mr rampuniyani....if whatever rubbish u said about jatis is true for bhakti movements,tantriks,samkhyaks etc. then u r truly a secular but if its not so u r another example of pseudo-critics of so-called hinduism.....with majority of your arguments hving
roots in colonial/pre-colonial christian polemics on so-called hindus...u only remind me of pandita ramabai & krishnamohan chatterjeee--pioneers of indian christian missionaries
ridiculous!!!Is there really
ridiculous!!!Is there really any hinduism there in this world---its nothing but an oversimplification of the indian history as a whole----a lame colonial era label to denote a large no. of movements & countermovements that occured in our Indian subcontinental civilization,,,only kept alive by pro-hindu & anti-hindu fanatics & a bunch of indologists(read, Doniger,Koenraad etc.)
1)how r these above mentioned people going to relate anti-ritualism of upanishads to vedas.2).how do they realte the atheistic dualism of samkhya to non-dualism+monism of upanishads(they say the 6 so called hindu darshans are derived from upanishads which in turn r commentaries on vedas)..3).how do they relate brahminical+ sanskritic culture of mimamsa to anti-brahminical+vernacular nature of bhakti movements of our villages...
4)how do the relate the logic +materialism + atomism of nyaya & vaisheshika to anti-materialism+mysticism+idealism of vedanta.....
they talk about hinduism worshipping brahman(the god of only vedanta)-the same way as christianity worships GOD....forgetting abt the large no. of devi-devtas that r prt of religion,language,literature,art,iconography of masses & that samkhya & mimamsa r atheistic indian schools of thought(unfortunately dubbed as hinduism)..
these western idiots only sell less b'coz of scholarship & more b'coz of controversies & truly sholarly works of surendranath dasgupta,debiprasad chhattopadhyaya,romila thapar,d d kosambi decays in dustbin with ignorant hindus (urban upper castes who hv lost there rural so-called hindu cultures & thus seek 2 return 2 a heavily sanskritised india which they modify acc. 2 there own fantasies),,,blaming them as anti-hindu,,which they were never...not evety leftist is an idiot like kancha or meera 2 gv unscholarly arguments...
ridiculous!!!Is there really
ridiculous!!!Is there really any hinduism there in this world---its nothing but an oversimplification of the indian history as a whole----a lame colonial era label to denote a large no. of movements & countermovements that occured in our Indian subcontinental civilization,,,only kept alive by pro-hindu & anti-hindu fanatics & a bunch of indologists(read, Doniger,Koenraad etc.)
1)how r these above mentioned people going to relate anti-ritualism of upanishads to vedas.2).how do they realte the atheistic dualism of samkhya to non-dualism+monism of upanishads(they say the 6 so called hindu darshans are derived from upanishads which in turn r commentaries on vedas)..3).how do they relate brahminical+ sanskritic culture of mimamsa to anti-brahminical+vernacular nature of bhakti movements of our villages...
4)how do the relate the logic +materialism + atomism of nyaya & vaisheshika to anti-materialism+mysticism+idealism of vedanta.....
they talk about hinduism worshipping brahman(the god of only vedanta)-the same way as christianity worships GOD....forgetting abt the large no. of devi-devtas that r prt of religion,language,literature,art,iconography of masses & that samkhya & mimamsa r atheistic indian schools of thought(unfortunately dubbed as hinduism)..
these western idiots only sell less b'coz of scholarship & more b'coz of controversies & truly sholarly works of surendranath dasgupta,debiprasad chhattopadhyaya,romila thapar,d d kosambi decays in dustbin with ignorant hindus (urban upper castes who hv lost there rural so-called hindu cultures & thus seek 2 return 2 a heavily sanskritised india which they modify acc. 2 there own fantasies),,,blaming them as anti-hindu,,which they were never...not evety leftist is an idiot like kancha or meera 2 gv unscholarly arguments...
as usual cribbing
YOu can expect anything better from ram punyani. Communist are the people who are not capable of becoming capitalist. Ram punyani can continously sit and bitch about hinduism taking reservation under manuvati sc/st for himself and his children in spite of him being well off will be his reality.
Post new comment