Data from India and Indian states.
Economic Impact of Inadequate Sanitation in India
1. The Indian economy loses nearly $54 billion (around Rs 24,000 crore) annually due to lack of toilets and poor hygiene equivalent to 6.4 percent of India’s GDP in 2006.
2. The cost of treatment for diseases due to poor hygiene was estimated at $38.5 billion (over Rs 17,000 crore).
3. The Planning Commission had earlier estimated that although 49% of the country's urban population has access to sanitary excreta disposal facility, only 28% have sewerage system (partial without treatment facility in many cases) and 21% only low cost sanitary latrine facility. About 60% of the generated solid waste is collected and disposed of, of which only 50% sanitarily.
4. World Bank officials estimate there are 4.5 lakh deaths out of 57.5 crore cases of diarrhoea every year and a large segment of the country's 1.20 crore population defecates in the open.
5. Costain said the Indian economy loses $260 million (over Rs 1,000 crore) in tourism revenues due to poor sanitation as tourists are reluctant to come to India due to lack of sanitation facilities.
Source: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/India-loses-Rs-24000cr-annually...
Report: http://www.wsp.org/wsp/sites/wsp.org/files/publications/wsp-esi-india.pdf
82% of rural India deprived of basic needs
1. The survey of over one lakh households on basic living standards in India also says that 20% of rural households don't have access to either of these facilities, just 2% more than a similar figure for urban India, where 67.5 % enjoy all three. For India, the figure was 33%.
2. Although the report says that access to these three facilities in rural areas had tripled since 1993, it revealed an increase in the rural urban divide since then. The coverage in urban areas increased by about 20% as compared to 12% in rural areas between 1993 and 2008-09, says the report.
3. Nearly 57% of households in rural India have to travel up to five km every day to fetch drinking water as compared to just 20% in urban areas.
4. Just 30% of households in rural India have access to tap drinking water as compared to 74% in urban areas.
5. There is one areas where there is no rural-urban disparity. That is separate rooms for married couples. Around 75% of couples in both rural and urban India have a separate room.
Source: http://www.hindustantimes.com/News-Feed/newdelhi/82-of-rural-India-depri...
1. In slum areas, where more than half of Mumbai lives, an average 81 people share a single toilet. In some places it rises to an eye-watering 273. Even the lowest average is still 58, according to local municipal authority figures.
2. In March, Mumbai's municipal authorities said there were 77,526 toilets in slum areas and 64,157 more were needed. Work is in progress on only 6,050.
3. The UN estimates that 600 million people or 55 percent of Indians still defecate outside.
4. Diseases like diarrhoea, which UNICEF says kills 1,000 Indian children aged under five every day.
5. Poor sanitation and the illnesses it causes cost the Indian economy 12 billion rupees (255 million dollars) a year, according to the health ministry.
Source: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/600-million-lack-toilets-in-Ind...











Analysis of New MLAs of Bihar 2010 Assembly Elections:
1. 141 newly elected MLAs (i.e. 59%) in Bihar Assembly Elections 2010 have pending criminal cases against them according to their self sworn affidavits. In 2005 Bihar Assembly, 117 (i.e.35%) MLAs had pending criminal cases.
2. 85 MLAs out of these 141 analyzed have declared pending serious IPC charges like murder and attempt to murder charges against them. In 2005, 68 MLAs had serious pending criminal cases.
3. 76 MLAs analyzed (32%) have not declared their PAN card details.
4. A total of 47 MLAs (i.e. 20%) analyzed are crorepatis in Bihar Assembly Elections 2010. In 2005, 8 MLAs were crorepatis.


Source: http://adrindia.org/files/Final%20Bihar%20MLAs%20reportv3_1.pdf

Black Money in India ( Global Financial Integrity Report 2010)
1. India is losing nearly Rs.240 crore every 24 hours, on average, in illegal financial flows out of the country. India’s aggregate illicit flows are more than twice the current external debt of US $230 billion.
2. The nation lost $213 billion (roughly Rs.9.7 lakh crore) in illegal capital flight between 1948 and 2008. These illicit financial flows were generally the product of: tax evasion, corruption, bribery and kickbacks, and criminal activities.
3. Over $125 billion (Rs.5.7 lakh crore) of that was lost in just this decade between 2000-2008.In just five years from 2004-08 alone, the country lost roughly Rs.4.3 lakh crore to such outflows.
4. Had India managed to avoid this staggering loss of capital, the country could have paid off its outstanding external debt of $230.6 billion (as of end-2008) and have another half left over for poverty alleviation and economic development.
5. Total capital flight represents approximately 16.6 per cent of India's GDP as of year-end 2008.
6. The total value of (such) illicit assets held abroad represents about 72 per cent of the size of India's underground economy which has been estimated at 50 per cent of India's GDP (or about $640 billion at end-2008) by several researchers. This implies that only about 28 per cent of illicit assets of India's underground economy are held domestically.
7. From 1948 through 2008 the Indian private sector shifted away from deposits into developed country banks and moved more of its money into offshore financial centers (OFCs). The share of OFC deposits increased from 36.4 percent in 1995 to 54.2 percent in 2009.
8. Some 68 percent of India’s aggregate illicit capital loss occurred after India’s economic reforms in 1991, indicating that deregulation and trade liberalization actually contributed to/accelerated the transfer of illicit money abroad.High net-worth individuals and private companies were found to be the primary drivers of illicit flows out of India's private sector.
Report: http://india.gfip.org/
Source: http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/article892140.ece
“World Giving Index”
1. The “World Giving Index”, the largest study ever carried out into charitable behaviour across the globe has found that happier people are more likely to give money to charity than those who are wealthy
2. The “World Giving Index” used a Gallup survey on the charitable behaviour of people in 153 countries representing 95% of the world’s population.
3. The survey asked people whether they had given money to charity in the last month and to rank how happy they are with life on a scale of one to ten. The study also measured two other types of charitable behaviour alongside giving money – volunteering time and helping a stranger.
4. Australia and New Zealand topped the “World Giving Index”. Malta was found to be the country with the largest percentage of the population (83%) giving money, the people of Turkmenistan are the most generous with their time with 61% having given time to charity and Liberia was top of the list for helping a stranger (76%).
5. Canada,Ireland, Switzerland, USA, Netherlands, United Kingdom, Sri Lanka and Austria
are on the top of the list.
6. India has ranked 134th with only 14% of Indian giving money, 12% giving time and only 30% helping the stranger.
7. In South Asia, Sri Lanka is placed 8th, Nepal 100th, Pakistan 142nd and Bangladesh 146th in this list. War torn Afghanistan is ranked 39th just above Finland and Sweden in the list. Myanmar has ranked 22nd in the list.
Full report: http://www.cafonline.org/pdf/0882A_WorldGivingReport_Interactive_070910.pdf
State of the World's Children 2011 (Unicef Report)
1. The future of adolescent girls in India seems dismal with a vicious cycle of underweight adolescence, child marriage and maternal mortality. More than half of them ( 56 per cent) are anaemic and 43 per cent are married off before the age of 18.
2. The appalling nutritional figures for adolescents puts India in the company of least developed nations such as Congo, Burkina Faso and Guinea.
3.India, in fact, beats even sub- Saharan Africa with the highest underweight adolescent girl population of 47 per cent in age group of 15 to 19 years. The country has the world's largest adolescent girl population ( 20 per cent).
4. According to the report, 43 per cent of girls were married off before the age of 18 and more than half of them gave birth before they turned adults.
5. India also displays very glaring gender disparities. While 30 per cent of boys between the ages of 15 and 19 years are anaemic, 56 per cent girls in the same age group suffer from the condition.
6. The adolescent birth rate also stands at 45 - the number of births per thousand women between the ages of 15 and 19 years.
7. About 57 per cent of the poorest children in the country are underweight compared to 20 per cent of the richest.
8. The risk of HIV infection is considerably higher in young females than young males. While 35 per cent of boys had knowledge of HIV and AIDS, only 28 per cent girls are adequately informed.
India's appalling figures
56 per cent girls are anaemic, on par with Congo, Burkina Faso & Guinea
47 per cent girls in the age group of 15 - 19 year are underweight - the highest underweight adolescent girl population
43 per cent of girls were married off before the age of 18. Only Bangladesh, Niger and Chad have higher figures
22 per cent gave birth before they turned 18
6,000 adolescent mothers die every year.
School attendance dropped from 86 per cent at primary level to 64 per cent for secondary schooling
For girls, school attendance dropped sharply as they move from primary to secondary school - from 83 per cent to 59 per cent
Source: http://indiatoday.intoday.in/site/Story/130959/latest-headlines/un-repor...
Report: http://www.unicef.org/publications/files/SOWC_2011_Main_Report_EN_022420...
http://www.unicef.org/sowc2011/pdfs/Table-1-Basic-Indicators_02092011.pdf
Girls Marriage (NCW Report)
1. Around 70 per cent of girls are below 18 at the time of their marriage in Hindi-speaking states like Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and Bihar.
2. 73 per cent girls under 18 marry in Madhya Pradesh followed by Rajasthan 68 per cent, Bihar 67 per cent and Uttar Pradesh 64 per cent.
3. In Andhra Pradesh too 71 per cent girls tied the knot while still below 18.
Source: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/70-girls-in-Hindi-belt-marry-be...
Violence in Schools (Plan International 2010 report)
1. Corporal punishment is widespread in Indian schools, despite being illegal. More than 65% children, its report claimed, said they were beaten. A majority of such victims are in state schools.
2. The study also discovered that caste and gender discrimination was the major cause of violence against children. It said many students abandoned their studies because of such humiliation, which included hitting with hands or sticks, making them stand in various positions for long periods and tying them to chairs. More boys (54%) than girls (45%) were subjected to corporal punishment.
3. Interestingly, many among the students interviewed believed corporal punishment was sometimes necessary. Students in Assam, Mizoram and UP reported highest rates of corporal punishment, while Rajasthan and Goa the lowest.
4. In India, 69% of children said they had been physically abused in different settings, including schools, but most said they had not reported it to anyone
5. In total, 12,500 school kids in 13 states between five and 18, as well as otherwise, took part in the research.
6. India is dubiously ranked third among 13 countries in terms of estimated economic cost of corporal punishment. Plan calculated that anything between $1.4 billion and $7.4 billion was lost every year in India by way of social benefits because of physical ill-treatment in schools.
Report: http://plan-international.org/files/global/publications/campaigns/Plan%2...
Source: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/More-than-50-Indian-kids-face-s...
Child Labour( ILO ‘Accelerating action against child labour’ 2010 report)
1. India has 445 million children, Bangladesh 64 million, and Pakistan 70 million, as compared to, for example, China’s 348 million.
2. In sheer numbers, India and Pakistan have by far the largest out-of-school child population in the world.
3. India still devotes about the same proportion of national income to education (about 3.5%) that it did in the mid-1980s.
4 Four states account for 40% of the country’s child workers.
Report: http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/documents/...
Source: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/India/Most-child-labourers-found-in-A...
Child Health ( UNICEF report 2009)
1. India has a whopping 61 million stunted children, the largest in any country,distantly followed by China that has 12 million children.
2. 3 out of 10 stunted children in the World are from India
3. Stunted growth is a consequence of long-term poor nutrition in early childhood. Stunting is associated with developmental problems and is often impossible to correct. A child who is stunted is likely to experience a lifetime of poor health and underachievement, a growing concern in India that is demographically a young nation.
4. Astoundingly more than 90% of the developing world's stunted children live in Africa and Asia.
Source: http://www.unicef.org/sowc09/report/report.php
Child Health (Save the Children-2009 Report)
1) A child dies every 15 seconds in India due to neonatal diseases while 20 lakh children die before reaching their fifth birthday.
2) Over four lakh newborns are dying every year within 24 hours of life in the country.
3) Over 20% of the world’s child deaths occur in India — the largest number anywhere in the world.
4) One in three of all malnourished children in the world live in India.
5) Around 46% of children under three are underweight in India.
6) Around 28% of child deaths are linked just to poor sanitation and unsafe drinking water
7) India's child mortality statistics are particularly poor, with 72 deaths per 1,000 live births, higher than neighbouring countries such as Bangladesh.
Source: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/news/india/In-India-a-child-dies-ever...
Hunger in India (United Nations World Food Programme (WFP)-2009 Report):
1. India ranks 94th in the Global Hunger Index of 119 countries.
2. India is failing its rural poor with 230 million people being undernourished — the highest for any country in the world.
3. Malnutrition accounts for nearly 50% of child deaths in India as every third adult (aged 15-49 years) is reported to be thin (BMI less than 18.5).
4. More than 27% of the world's undernourished population lives in India while 43% of children (under 5 years) in the country are underweight.
5. More than 70% of children (under-5) suffer from anaemia and 80% of them don't get vitamin supplements.
6. According to the report, the proportion of anaemic children has actually increased by 6% in the past six years with 11 out of 19 states having more than 80% of its children suffering from anaemia.
7. The proportion of stunted children (under-5) at 48% is again among the highest in the world. Every second child in the country is stunted, according to the health ministry's figures.
8. Around 30% of babies in India are born underweight.
9. Almost 80% of rural households do not have access to toilets within their premises. The figure exceeds 90% in states like Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Orissa and MP.
Source: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/India-tops-world-hunger-chart/a...
Corruption in India (TI’s Global Corruption Barometer survey-2010)
1. About 54% Indians paid a bribe in the past year. Extent of corruption in India is at levels comparable with Cambodia, Nigeria, Afghanistan, Senegal, Uganda and Liberia.
2. India is the ninth most corrupt country in the world, in a ranking of 86 countries, with 54% of people reporting having paid a bribe. War-torn Iraq (56%) and Afghanistan (61%) suffer worse levels than India, as do nations such as Liberia (89%), Uganda (86%), Nigeria (63%), Sierra Leone (71%), Senegal (56%) and Cambodia (84%).
3. The world average is 25%, while the Asia Pacific average is 11%. The European Union enjoys an average of 5%, as does North America (Canada is marginally less corrupt than the United States), while Latin America and North Africa reported an average of 36%. Sub Saharan Africa has an average of 56%, compared with India’s 54%.
4. ndians perceived political parties to be the most corrupt, ranking them 4.2 on a scale of one to five. Political parties are followed by Police (4.1), Parliament/legislature (4) and civil servants (3.5). Private sector, NGOs and judiciary are all seen to be similarly corrupt (3.1), with the media enjoying a marginally better rating at 3. Military (2.8) and religious bodies (2.9) enjoy better public confidence.
5. Seventy-four percent Indians believed that levels of corruption has increased during the last three years, compared with a world average of 56% and Asia-Pacific average of 47%.
Source: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/7073774.cms
Report: http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/gcb/2010
Corruption in India (TI 2010 report)
1. India this year is ranked at 87 among 178 countries, down three spots from 84 in 2009.
2. Marginal decline in India's integrity score to 3.3 in 2010 from 3.5 in 2007 and 3.4 in 2008 and 2009 on a scale from zero (perceived to be the highly corrupt) to 10 (low levels of corruption).
3. Somalia is considered the world’s most corrupt country with a score of 1.1 followed by Myanmar and Afghanistan, while Denmark, New Zealand and Singapore are perceived to be the least corrupt with scores of 9.3.
4. China is at the 78th position, indicating it is less corrupt than India. While Pakistan is shown as just a notch worse off than India, the US ranks fairly high at 22nd and is perceived to have relatively low levels of corruption. In Asia, Bhutan is perceived to be the least corrupt country.
5. India’s ranking has consistently dipped since 2006 when it was ranked 70 among 163 countries.
Report: http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/cpi/2010/res...
1) Global Corruption Perception Index: India has been ranked 84th in the list of 180 countries in terms of public-sector corruption, which is perceived to be highly corrupt.
2)India's integrity score this year is 3.4, same as for the year 2008.With the exception of Bhutan, which has a score of 5.0, India with 3.4 is still at the top of all the South Asian countries. Nearly half out of 180 countries have scored three or even lower points; a clear indication that corruption is perceived to be rampant. Haiti, Iraq, Myanmar and Somalia have recorded the lowest score of less than 1.5.
Source: http://www.transparencyindia.org/CPI_2009_Press_Release_India.pdf
Most corrupt in India (TI-2009 report):
1.Political Parties
2.Public officials/Civil Servants
3.Parliament/ Legislature
4.Business/Private Sector
5.Judiciary
6.Media
Source: http://www.transparency.org/news_room/latest_news/press_releases/2009/20...
1. Bribe paid by BPL families in Jharkhand in 2008 was around Rs 16 crore.
2. The finding shows that corruption was highest in basic services which are free for BPL families like health, school education and water supply.
3. Corruption is also rampant in police department and schemes under NREGA, land record and banking.
Sourse: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/ranchi/Jharkhand-BPL-families-pa...
Best countries for business: Forbes' annual list ranks 127 nations on the basis of business climate in a country for entrepreneurs, investors and workers.
2009: 75 / 127
Trade freedom: 125
Technology: 64
Corruption: 75
Monetary freedom: 107
Red tape: 90
Personal freedom: 54
Investor protection: 30
Innovation: 30
Intellectual property rights: 44
GDP growth: 14
2008: 64
http://www.indianexpress.com/news/'India+ran.../436596/
Education:
Illiteracy: India has 35% of the world’s total illiterates. [2008]
Out of school children: 320 lakh in 2001-02 | 76 lakh in 2007-08.
World Bank Report(2009):
1. 48 of every 100 students in India pursuing secondary education never go beyond that level.
2. India's gross enrolment rates (GER) in secondary school is 40 percent compared to 70 percent in East Asia and 82 percent in Latin America. Countries like Vietnam and Bangladesh which have lower per capita incomes than India have higher gross enrollment rates (GER) in secondary schools.
3. 40 million children were enrolled in secondary school in 2008. The majority of them were boys, children from the urban areas, and those who belonged to the wealthier segments of the population.
4. Enrollment varies greatly between states, from 92% in Kerala, 44% in Tamil Nadu, 22% in Bihar, and 4% in Jharkhand. 37% of secondary students fail, and 11% dropout before exam.
5. 75% of public funding for secondary schools comes from states. Less than 10% of this is for investment. While recurrent financing, mainly for teacher salaries, has been stable, the financing of new investments has declined.
6. 60% of the secondary school system is privately managed - through unaided and aided private schools. Private unaided schools provide 30% of total secondary enrollment nationwide (2004-05), up from 15% in 1993-94.
7. On average, government school teachers earn 3 times more than their counterparts in private schools.
(http://www.worldbank.org.in/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/COUNTRIES/SOUTHASIAEXT/INDIA...)
Primary-school Teacher Absence(World Bank Report 2002-03)
Country Absence Rate (%)
Bangladesh 16
Ecuador 14
India 25
Indonesia 19
Peru 11
Papua New Guinea 15
Uganda 27
Zambia 17
Source: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/DEC/Resources/37912_Ecuador.Teacher.A...
Missing Teachers(World Bank-Harvard University study-06)
1. 25 per cent of teachers were absent from school and only about half were teaching.
2. Rates of absenteeism varied from under 15 per cent in Maharashtra to 42 per cent in Jharkhand. The rates were found to be higher in the "poorer States."
3. Maharashtra had the lowest rate — 14.6 per cent. In Kerala it was 21.2 per cent, in Tamil Nadu 21.3 per cent, in Karnataka 21.7 per cent and in West Bengal 24.7 per cent. On the higher side. The rate was 34.4 per cent in Punjab, 37.8 per cent in Bihar, and 41.9 per cent in Jharkhand.
4. Categories of absence of teachers, the study found that it was 30.2 per cent in the case of head teachers, 22.2 per cent in the case of deputy heads, 23.1 per cent in respect of permanent or regular teachers, and 24 per cent in the case of contract/informal candidates.
5.Teacher absence was considerably lower in schools with better infrastructure, a potentially important pointer to the importance of working conditions.
Source: http://www.thehindu.com/2006/04/05/stories/2006040506971100.htm
Teacher and Pupil Ratio
1. The all-India teacher and pupil ratio for primary schools in 2005-06 stood at 1:46. But states like Bihar had a teacher to pupil ratio of 1:104, Jharkhand 1:79 and West Bengal 1:50.
Source: http://www.hindustantimes.com/rssfeed/newdelhi/Who-will-teach-the-teache...
State-wise Release of Funds for Solar Energy Programmes
(Rs. in Lakhs)
|
States & UTs/Financial Year
|
2005-06
|
2006-07
|
2007-08 |
|
Andhra Pradesh |
49.8 |
44.2 |
42.00 |
|
Arunachal Pradesh |
34.81 |
280.6 |
199.14 |
|
Assam |
50 |
0 |
147.41 |
|
Bihar |
9.12 |
22.95 |
25.94 |
|
Chandigarh |
0.08 |
0 |
3.83 |
|
Chattisgarh |
14.16 |
47.7 |
25.94 |
|
Delhi |
17.5 |
8.5 |
16.40 |
|
Goa |
0 |
13.25 |
1.68 |
|
Gujarat |
36.97 |
280.59 |
95.15 |
|
Himachal Pradesh |
1.77 |
505.62 |
123.52 |
|
Haryana |
165.78 |
355.32 |
401.15 |
|
Jammu & Kashmir |
3.2 |
210.33 |
248.17 |
|
Jharkhand |
5.91 |
0 |
0 |
|
Karnataka |
326.35 |
312.23 |
29.42 |
|
Kerala |
74.54 |
0 |
5.72 |
|
Madhya Pradesh |
3 |
129.01 |
2.02 |
|
Maharashtra |
107.97 |
270.88 |
1045.49 |
|
Manipur |
24.98 |
15.95 |
10.82 |
|
Meghalaya |
154.76 |
424.78 |
493.21 |
|
Mizoram |
110.71 |
100.9 |
97.35 |
|
Nagaland |
6.98 |
94.9 |
0 |
|
Orissa |
2.26 |
76.48 |
0.32 |
|
Pondicherry |
5.09 |
2 |
4.80 |
|
Punjab |
11.8 |
62.9 |
184.98 |
|
Rajasthan |
246.16 |
396.82 |
411.87 |
|
Sikkim |
0 |
110.14 |
111.44 |
|
Tamil Nadu |
107.23 |
253.27 |
11.08 |
|
Tripura |
1.71 |
0 |
109.98 |
|
Uttar Pradesh |
174.99 |
171.85 |
85.29 |
|
Uttrakhand |
273.23 |
1246.33 |
573.03 |
|
West Bengal |
325.81 |
341.78 |
397.50 |
|
IREDA / Banks/Others |
3465.76 |
1706.03 |
2708.30 |
|
Total |
5812.43 |
7485.31 |
7701.30 |
State-wise
Manufacturers of Solar Photovoltaic Cells
/Modules, Solar Water Heaters and Solar Cookers
|
S. No.
|
State
|
Solar |
SPV |
FPC |
ETC |
Box |
Concentrating |
|
1. |
Andhra Pradesh |
1 |
6 |
5 |
3 |
|
1 |
|
2. |
Gujarat |
|
|
4 |
2 |
5 |
3 |
|
3. |
Haryana |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4. |
Himachal Pradesh |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
5. |
Karnataka |
3 |
6 |
27 |
8 |
|
4 |
|
6. |
Kerala |
|
1 |
|
3 |
|
1 |
|
7. |
Madhya Pradesh |
|
|
|
|
1 |
1 |
|
8. |
Maharashtra |
|
1 |
15 |
13 |
|
4 |
|
9. |
Punjab |
|
1 |
2 |
|
1 |
|
|
10. |
Rajasthan |
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
11. |
Tamil Nadu |
2 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
|
1 |
|
12. |
Uttar Pradesh |
2 |
2 |
|
|
2 |
1 |
|
13. |
Uttrakhand |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
14. |
West Bengal |
1 |
1 |
|
2 |
1 |
|
|
15. |
Delhi |
|
|
1 |
8 |
1 |
4 |
|
|
Total |
9 |
21 |
59 |
43 |
11 |
21 |
This information
was given by the Minister of State for New and Renewable Energy, Shri Vilas Muttemwar
in a written reply to a question by Shri N.R. Govindarajar in the Rajya Sabha
today.
English in India:
1. Only 43.8% of class I kids could read the alphabets, even in big capital letters.
2. Gujarat is the worst with barely 25.3% class 1 children able to read capital letters. Bihar, Orissa, Assam and Jharkhand are only marginally better at 33.4%, 34.5%, 36% and 41.8%.
3. Karnataka, despite its hi-tech glitter, scores just as bad only 37% of class I kids could pass the simple English test.
4. In Kerala, the knowledge of English appeared the best with 85% of kids reading capital letters, West Bengal was way below at 57%.
5. In class V the all-India average of students who can read sentences is 25.7%, by class VIII it goes up to 60.2%.
6. Kerala, In class V only 54.5% children can read English sentences. In Gujarat it is abysmally low at 8%. In Tamil Nadu, only 19% children of class V can read sentences while in Uttar Pradesh it is 14%. Bihar remains more or less consistent at 31.3%.
source: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Just-44-Class-1-kids-know-Engli...
EXPORTS UP BY 26.59% DURING MARCH 2008
FOREIGN TRADE DATA – APRIL-MARCH 2008
India’s exports during March, 2008 were valued at US $ 16282.79 million which was 26.59 per cent higher than the level of US $ 12862.40 million during March, 2007. In rupee terms, exports touched Rs.65710.71 crore, which was 16.04 per cent higher than the value of exports during March, 2007. Cumulative value of exports for the period April-March, 2008 was US$ 155512.49 million (Rs.625471.22 crore) as against US $ 126413.99 million (Rs.571779 crore) registering a growth of 23.02 per cent in Dollar terms and 9.39 per cent in Rupee terms over the same period last year.
India’s imports during March, 2008 were valued at US $ 23174.94 million representing an increase of 35.24 per cent over the level of imports valued at US $ 17136.46 million in March, 2007. In Rupee terms, imports increased by 23.96 per cent. Cumulative value of imports for the period April- March, 2008 was US $ 235910.73 million (Rs.949133.82 crore) as against US $ 185735.17 million (Rs.840506 crore) registering a growth of 27.01 per cent in Dollar terms and 12.92 per cent in Rupee terms over the same period last year.
Oil imports during March, 2008 were valued at US $ 8633.14 million which was 76.6 per cent higher than oil imports valued at US $ 4888.47 million in the corresponding period last year. Oil imports during April- March, 2008 were valued at US $ 77033.57 million which was 35.28 per cent higher than the oil imports of US $ 56945.25 million in the corresponding period last year.
Non-oil imports during March, 2008 were estimated at US $ 14541.79 million which was 18.73 per cent higher than non-oil imports of US $ 12247.99 million in March, 2007. Non-oil imports during April-March, 2008 were valued at US $ 158877.15 million which was 23.36 per cent higher than the level of such imports valued at US$ 128789.74 million in April- March, 2007.
The trade deficit for April- March, 2008 was estimated at US $ 80398.24 million which was higher than the deficit at US $ 59321.18 million during April- March, 2007.
Foreigners in India<?b>
1. The Home Ministry reports that 352,000 foreigners were registered in India as of December 31, 2007, just 0.03 percent of the population.
2. Students (8.2 percent) accounted for the highest percentage of foreigners in 2006, followed by employees (5.2 percent).
3. The 2001 census revealed that more than 6 million residents were born outside the country (including Indian citizens born abroad), but almost all (5.7 million) were from the neighboring countries of Bangladesh, Pakistan, and Nepal; Sri Lanka and Burma accounted for another 243,000.
4. Only 227,000 individuals were born outside of the region: 28 percent of them in Africa, 25 percent in the Middle East, and only 20 percent in Northern America, Europe, and Oceania combined.
Source: http://www.migrationinformation.org/Profiles/display.cfm?ID=745#16
Religious Freedom : International Religious Freedom Report 2008
(http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/irf/2008/108500.htm)
Press Freedom Index: 120 out of 169 countries. [http://www.rsf.org/article.php3?id_article=24025]
Indian Diaspora:
The term "Indian diaspora" refers to all persons of Indian descent living outside India, as long as they preserve some major Indian ethnocultural characteristics. Only nationals of Pakistan and Bangladesh are excluded from this term since those countries were part of the larger British India before 1947 and thus constitute a special case.
A common distinction with regard to ethnic Indians outside India, often referred to as overseas Indians, is made between non-resident Indians (NRIs), who hold Indian citizenship, and persons of Indian origin (PIOs), who do not.
Places with More than 100,000 Members
Asia
Myanmar: 2,902,000
Malaysia: 1,665,000
Sri Lanka: 855,025
Nepal: 583,599
Singapore: 307,000
Africa
South Africa: 1,000,000
Mauritius: 715,756
Reunion: 220,055
Kenya: 102,500
Oceania
Fiji: 336,829
Australia: 190,000
Caribbean
Trinidad & Tobago: 500,600
Guyana: 395,350
Suriname: 150,456
Northern America
USA: 1,678,765
Canada: 851,000
Europe
UK: 1,200,000
Netherlands: 217,000
Gulf
Saudia Arabia: 1,500,000
UAE: 950,000
Oman: 312,000
Kuwait: 295,000
Qatar: 131,000
Bahrain: 130,000
Yemen: 100,900
Source: http://www.migrationinformation.org/Profiles/display.cfm?ID=745
Remittances to India in Billions of US Dollars

Source Regions of Remittance Flows to India

Indian Immigrants in the United States
1. According to the US Census Bureau, there were over one million immigrants from India in the United States in 2000.
2. The foreign born from India (1 million) made up the third-largest immigrant group in 2000, following the foreign born from Mexico (9.2 million) and the Philippines (1.4 million). The fourth and fifth-largest immigrant groups in 2000 were from China (excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan) (988,857) and Vietnam (988,174).
3. Of the 31.1 million foreign born in the US, 3.3 percent were immigrants from India, according to the results of Census 2000.
4. According to Census 2000, California had the largest number of foreign born from India (198,201), followed by New Jersey (119,491), and New York (117,238). The remaining 10 states with the largest number of immigrants from India include Illinois (83,916), Texas (78,388), Pennsylvania (37,541), Michigan (36,323), Florida (32,295), Maryland (32,276), and Virginia (30,611).
5. Of the total foreign born from India in 2000, California had the largest proportion (19 percent), followed by New Jersey (12 percent), New York (11 percent), Illinois (8 percent), and Texas (8 percent). Combined, these five states accounted for 58 percent of the total Indian immigrant population.
6. The foreign-born population from India increased from 450,406 in 1990 to 1,022,552 in 2000, or by 572,146 persons, according to the results of Census 2000, representing an increase of 127 percent.
7. According to the results of Census 2000, the states that experienced the most rapid growth in their foreign-born populations from India include Idaho (517 percent), Oregon (419 percent), and Colorado (400 percent), followed by Georgia (271 percent), Washington (268 percent), Minnesota (260 percent), Wyoming (241 percent), Kentucky (221 percent), North Dakota (206 percent), and Nevada (193 percent).
8. Census 2000 shows that the foreign-born population from India in Georgia increased from 7,511 in 1990 to 27,834 in 2000, representing a 271 percent increase. Among all states and the District of Columbia, Georgia ranked seventh in the numeric growth and fourth in the percent growth of its Indian immigrant population.
9. According to the results of Census 2000, immigrants from India account for 0.4 percent of the total population of 281.4 million. In only one state – New Jersey (1.4 percent) – did the foreign born from India make up more than one percent of the total state population.
Source: http://www.migrationinformation.org/USFocus/display.cfm?ID=185
http://www.migrationinformation.org/pdf/MPI-Spotlight-on-Indian-Immigran...
Best place to be a mother( Save the Children: 2010)
1. India is in the unenviable position of 73rd out of 77 middle-income countries.
2.India still ranks first out of 12 countries that account for two-thirds of under-five and maternal deaths in the world.
3. In India, the shortfall of ASHA workers is estimated at a huge 74,000 (government norm is one Asha for 1,000 population) and ANMs at 21,066 (one ANM for 5,000 population in plain areas and 3,000 for rural areas).
Report: http://www.savethechildren.org/publications/state-of-the-worlds-mothers-...
http://www.savethechildren.org/publications/state-of-the-worlds-mothers-...
Source: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/NEWS/India/India-among-worst-places-t...
Child Health (Save the Children-2009 Report)
1) A child dies every 15 seconds in India due to neonatal diseases while 20 lakh children die before reaching their fifth birthday.
2) Over four lakh newborns are dying every year within 24 hours of life in the country.
3) Over 20% of the world’s child deaths occur in India — the largest number anywhere in the world.
4) One in three of all malnourished children in the world live in India.
5) Around 46% of children under three are underweight in India.
6) Around 28% of child deaths are linked just to poor sanitation and unsafe drinking water
7) India's child mortality statistics are particularly poor, with 72 deaths per 1,000 live births, higher than neighbouring countries such as Bangladesh.
Source: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/news/india/In-India-a-child-dies-ever...
Blind in India(2009)
1. Nearly two million people are blind in India.
2. Around 66 percent of them are women.
3. As many as two million people in India are corneally blind. Every year, 30,000 more are added to this figure. Half of the people suffering from this can get their sight restored through corneal graft surgery. However, against the annual demand for 100,000 corneas, only 16,000 are available.
Source: http://www.twocircles.net/2009oct08/two_out_every_three_blind_india_are_...
Mental Health in India
1. There are over two crore Indians who suffer from serious mental illnesses; more than five crore from milder forms.
2. About 50-90 per cent of them do not have access to medical help.
3. The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), in a report on mental health released in September 2008, said that the morbidity rate on account mental illness will be greater than that from cardiovascular diseases by 2010.
Source: http://www.expressbuzz.com/edition/story.aspx?Title=%E2%80%98Two+crore+I...
Sanitary Practices(World Health organisation and UNICEF 'Diarrhoea: Why Children Are Still Dying and What Can Be Done'):
1. Out of a total of 2.5 billion people worldwide that
defecate openly, 665 million belong to India.
2. Some 88 per cent of diarrhoeal deaths worldwide are attributable to unsafe water, inadequate sanitation and poor hygiene.
Source: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/India-has-largest-number-of-peo...
Diabetes (2009 Report)
1. India continues to be the “diabetes capital” of the world and by the year 2010 about 50.8 million people in the 20 to 79 age group in the country will have diabetes.
2. International Diabetes Federation (IDF), projects that by 2030 about 87 million people will have diabetes.
3. The number of Indians with ‘pre-diabetic’ condition of impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) is also very high — about 39.5 million people will have IGT in 2010 and the number will be 64.1 million in 2030.
Source: http://beta.thehindu.com/health/medicine-and-research/article36011.ece
55% of India's population poor( (Multi-dimensional Poverty Index- Developed by the Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative (OPHI) for the United Nations Development Programmes (UNDP))
1. About 645 million people or 55% of India's population is poor as measured by this composite indicator made up of ten markers of education, health and standard of living achievement levels.
2. The new data also shows that even in states generally perceived as prosperous such as Haryana, Gujarat and Karnataka, more than 40% of the population is poor by the new composite measure, while Kerala is the only state in which the poor constitute less than 20%.
3. A person is defined as poor if he or she is deprived on at least 3 of the 10 indicators. By this definition, 55% of India was poor, close to double India's much-criticised official poverty figure of 29%. Almost 20% of Indians are deprived on 6 of the 10 indicators.
4. Half of all children in India are under-nourished according to the National Family Health Survey III (2005-06). Close to 40% of those who are defined as poor are also nutritionally deprived.
5. A comparison of the state of Madhya Pradesh and the sub-Saharan nation of the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), which have close to the same population and a similar MPI (0.389 and 0.393 respectively), shows that nutritional deprivation, arguably the most fundamental part of poverty, in MP far exceeds that in the DRC.Nutritional deprivation contributes to almost 20% of MP's MPI and only 5% of the DRC's MPI.
6. Multi-dimensional poverty is highest (81.4% poor) among Scheduled Tribes within India's Hindu population, followed by Scheduled Castes (65.8%), Other Backward Class (58.3%) and finally the general population (33.3%).
7. Based on the MPI, Bihar has by far the most poor of any state in the country, with 81.4% of its population defined as poor, which is close to 12% more than the next worst state of Uttar Pradesh.
8. As per the Planning Commission's figures, 41.4% of Bihar and 32.8% of UP is poor. In a possible indication of inadequate access to health and education facilities which do not show up in income poverty, almost 60% of north-east India and close to 50% of Jammu & Kashmir are poor as per the MPI, while the Planning Commission figures are around 16% and 5% respectively.
Report: http://www.ophi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/Country-Brief-India.pdf
Source: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/55-of-Indias-population-poor-Re...
Global Hunger Index 2010, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)
1. India has been ranked 67, way below neighbouring countries like China and Pakistan. China is rated much ahead of India at the ninth place, while Pakistan is at the 52nd place.
2. Among other neighbouring countries, Sri Lanka was at the 39th position and Nepal ranked 56 by index. Bangladesh listed at the 68th position.
3. India is home to 42% of the world's underweight children, while Pakistan has just 5%, it added.
4. The index rated 84 countries on the basis of three leading indicators -- prevalence of child malnutrition, rate of child mortality, and the proportion of people who are calorie deficient.
Source: http://www.ifpri.org/publication/2010-global-hunger-index
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/India-ranks-below-China-Pak-in-...
http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/TrackingHunger-statistics/track...
United Nations Millennium Development Goals report, 2010.
1. In 2005-2007, the proportion of undernourished people in South Asia had swelled to levels last seen in 1990.
2. The prevalence of hunger had increased from 20% in 2000-2002 to 21% in 2005-2007.
3. The regional average was 21% in 1990-92, indicating that no progress had been made in the last two decades in reducing hunger levels and that India — the dominant country in the region — will not be able to meet its millennium development goals.
4. According to UN figures, the employment to population ratio in South Asia fell to 56% in 2008 from 57% in 1998. The 2009 estimates put it even lower at 55%.
5. The proportion of employed people living under $1.25 a day jumped sharply from 44% in 2008 to 51% in 2009.
Report: http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/pdf/MDG%20Report%202010%20En%20r15%20-...
Source: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Hunger-back-to-1990-levels-in-S...

Source: Hindustan Times
Hunger in India (United Nations World Food Programme (WFP)-2009 Report):
1. India ranks 94th in the Global Hunger Index of 119 countries.
2. India is failing its rural poor with 230 million people being undernourished — the highest for any country in the world.
3. Malnutrition accounts for nearly 50% of child deaths in India as every third adult (aged 15-49 years) is reported to be thin (BMI less than 18.5).
4. More than 27% of the world's undernourished population lives in India while 43% of children (under 5 years) in the country are underweight.
5. More than 70% of children (under-5) suffer from anaemia and 80% of them don't get vitamin supplements.
6. According to the report, the proportion of anaemic children has actually increased by 6% in the past six years with 11 out of 19 states having more than 80% of its children suffering from anaemia.
7. The proportion of stunted children (under-5) at 48% is again among the highest in the world. Every second child in the country is stunted, according to the health ministry's figures.
8. Around 30% of babies in India are born underweight.
9. Almost 80% of rural households do not have access to toilets within their premises. The figure exceeds 90% in states like Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Orissa and MP.
Source: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/India-tops-world-hunger-chart/a...
Hunger(Action Aid report 2009):
1. India, with 47 per cent of its children under the age of six malnourished, ranks below countries like Bangladesh and Nepal on the state of hunger.
2. 30 million more people have joined the ranks of the hungry since the mid-nineties. Whereas China cut hunger numbers by 58 million in ten years through strong state support for smallholder farmers.
3. On Hunger Index of developing countries, India ranked 22nd out 29 countries above Guinea Bissau, Liberia, Sierra Leone, Pakistan, Haiti, Burundi and Democratic Republic of Congo.
This index was developed keeping in mind country legal commitment to the right to food, their investment in agriculture and social protection, and their performance on hunger and child nutrition.
4. Brazil (Ranked 1st): within six years, the program Fome Zero (Zero Hunger) has introduced food banks, community kitchens and locally procured school meals along with simultaneous support for smallholder family farmers and
land reform settlers. The result: child malnutrition has fallen by 73 percent and child deaths by 45 percent.
5. China (Ranked 2nd): through heavy investment in supporting its poor farmers and a relatively equitable distribution of land, has reduced the number of undernourished people by 58 million between 1990 and 2001. Now less than 9 percent of the
population goes hungry.
6. Ghana (Ranked 3rd) has made food security a national priority and backed this with consistent support to smallholder farmers and democratic, stable governance.
Ghana has made remarkable strides in reducing hunger – especially for a low income country.
7. Vietnam (Ranked 4th) pursued equitable land reform and investment in smallholders, and with relatively strong social policies has made unprecedented progress, reducing poverty by half in the decade of the nineties, with comparatively low
levels of inequality.
8. Even Malawi (Ranked 5th), one of the poorest countries in the world, and burdened with a devastatinng HIV epidemic to boot – has reaped rich results within three short years. Through a massive boost of investment to small scale farmers, it has trebled production to halt a famine that threatened to leave nearly a third of its population hungry.
poor countries have made striking progress. On the other hand, some middle income countries have allowed rural misery to
deepen in the midst of growing wealth. Pakistan, for instance, is performing no better than desperately poor and conflict-torn countries such as Sierra Leone, despite having a per capita income over two and half times higher.India ranks
below Ethiopia and Cambodia.
Source: http://www.actionaid.org/docs/hungerfree_scorecards.pdf
Illiteracy in India(The Education For All-Global Monitoring Report-09)
1. India still has the largest number of illiterate adults in the world.Out of the total 759 million illiterate adults in the world, India still has the highest number
2. Over half of the illiterate adults live in just four countries: Bangladesh, China, India and Pakistan.
3. Gender disparities remain deeply engrained, with 28 nations across the developing world having nine or fewer girls in school for every 10 boys.
4. The report said two-thirds of the total illiterate people are women.
5.On current trends, the world will be less than halfway towards this goal by 2015. India alone will have a shortfall of some 81 million literate people.
Source: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0018/001865/186525E.pdf
Human Development Index 2010
1. Rapid economic growth of the past decade has ensured India a place among the top 10 movers on GDP growth, but the country ranks a low 119 among 169 countries on the 2010 Human Development Index .
2. Life expectancy at birth is 64.4 years in India. In comparison, people living in countries such as Norway, Australia, New Zealand and many countries across Europe are expected to live beyond 80 years. The world average is 69.3 years. The Chinese are expected to live about 73.5 years
3. The number of years a person has spent in school is a dismal 4.4 years for India as compared to global average of 7.4 and 4.6 for South Asia.
4. Beginning 1980, India’s HDI values has increased from 0.320 to 0.519, an increase of 62%. In the same period, life expectancy at birth increased almost 9%, mean years of schooling by close to three years, and expected years of schooling by four years and per capita GNI by 254%.
Report: http://hdrstats.undp.org/en/countries/profiles/IND.html
http://hdr.undp.org/en/mediacentre/
Source: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/indicators/India-ranks-...
World Prosperity Index 2010
1. India has slipped 10 places to the 88th spot from 78th in 2009.
2. China is ranked 58th in the list of 110 countries, which is topped by Norway. Other countries in the top five are Denmark (2), Finland (3), Australia (4) and NewZeland (5).
3. China is ranked 58th in the list of 110 countries, which is topped by Norway. Other countries in the top five are Denmark (2), Finland (3), Australia (4) and NewZeland (5).
4. India has ranked low on education ground (89th in the Index), Governance (41st) health (95th), Safety & Security (78th), Personal Freedom (74th), entrepreneurship and opportunity (93rd), and social Capital (105th).
5.India Ranking in various Indices
Legatum Prosperity Index-- 88th / 110
Average Life Satisfaction Ranking -- 94th / 110
Per Capita GDP Ranking -- 86th / 110
WEF Global Competitiveness Index-- 51st / 139
UN Human Development Index-- 134th / 182
Heritage/WSJ Economic Freedom Index-- 124th / 179
TI Corruption Perceptions Index-- 84th / 180
Vision of Humanity Global Peace Index-- 128th / 149
5. On the lower end of the rankings were Zimbabwe (110), Pakistan (109), Central African Republic (108), Ethiopia (107) and Nigeria (106).
6. The Legatum Prosperity Index is the world's only global assessment of wealth and well being. It uses a holistic definition of prosperity, which includes factors ranging from economic growth to health and education, to personal freedom and governance
Report: http://www.prosperity.com/country.aspx?id=IN
http://www.prosperity.com/rankings.aspx
source: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/India-slips-10-spots-to-88th-on...
Newsweek World's Best Countries List 2010
1. India ranks 78th on the World's Best Countries' list compiled by Newsweek magazine, which placed nations on the basis of health, education, economy and politics.
2. India ranking in various category:
Education: 88th
Health: 82nd
Quality of Life:87th
Economic Dynamism: 38th
Political Environment: 48th.
3. Nicaragua is on 75th followed by Honduras 76th and Bolivia on 77th. Iran is on 79th followed by Botswana on 80th and Vietnam on 81st.
4. India gets 2.5 for freedom of expression, political participation and electoral processes from Freedom House with 1 being the highest score. Pakistan scores low with 4.5.
5. In the 'ease of doing' business category, India gets 133th rank, according to World Bank, which puts 1 as the best place to do business.
Report: http://www.newsweek.com/2010/08/15/interactive-infographic-of-the-worlds...
Source: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/India-at-78th-spot-on-Newsweeks...
The Failed States Index
2010:
India is ranked 79 in a list of 177 countries. In India's immediate neighbourhood, Burma has been placed at 13, Sri Lanka (22) and Nepal 25. China is ranked at 57th place.
Dominic Republic, Saudi Arabia, Honduras and El Salvador are placed just above India in the list.
http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2010/06/21/2010_failed_states_inde...
2009: India was ranked 87.
Childrens' index: 76 out of 81 countries. [http://www.savethechildren.org/publications/mothers/2008/SOWM-2008-full-report.pdf]
Child Marriage:More than a third of the world's child brides are from India.
Nearly 25 million women in India were married in the year 2007 by the age of 18.
(http://www.unicef.org/sowc09/index.php)
Child Labour: About 44 million, or 13 percent of all children in south Asia, are engaged in labour, with more than half in India.
(http://www.unicef.org/sowc09/index.php)
Global Hunger Index: 94 out of 118 countries [International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington]
Global Peace Index: 2010 ranking 128 out of 149 countries; 2009: 122; 2008: 107; 2007: 109
[ http://www.visionofhumanity.org/]
Happiness ranking: 69 out 98 countries (World Values Survey data)
[http://www.nsf.gov/news/newsmedia/pr111725/pr111725.pdf]
Legatum Prosperity Index:45 out of 104 countries
Average Life Satisfaction Ranking: 68th / 104
Per Capita GDP Ranking: 83rd / 104
WEF Global Competitiveness Index: 49th / 133
UN Human Development Index: 132nd / 179
Heritage/WSJ Economic Freedom Index: 123rd / 178
TI Corruption Perceptions Index: 85th / 180
Vision of Humanity Global Peace Index: 122nd / 144
Economic Fundamentals - Ranked 43rd
Given the size of the workforce, India has a very low level of fixed capital investment
Entrepreneurship and Innovation - Ranked 55th
There is an increasingly good environment for entrepreneurship but the reach of the high-tech export boom is surprisingly limited
Democratic Institutions - Ranked 36th
India is an imperfect, but functioning democracy
Education - Ranked 86th
Education is an area in which India needs to make considerable progress, despite the well publicised presence of an educated elite
Health - Ranked 88th
India suffers severe underinvestment in medical facilities
Safety and Security - Ranked 87th
India has the highest level of casualties from political violence of any country in the Index
Governance - Ranked 41st
While India ranks well for overall governance, alarming concerns about corruption are pervasive
Personal Freedom - Ranked 47th
Citizens give India moderately high scores with regard to personal freedom and tolerance towards minorities
Social Capital - Ranked 5th
Indian citizens report high levels of membership in community organisations, allowing for a broad network of social capital
Source: http://www.prosperity.com/country.aspx?id=IN
Human Development Index:
134 out of 182 countries(2009)
126 out of 177 countries (2008)
(http://hdr.undp.org/en/statistics/)
Mothers' index: ranked 66th out of 71 countries. [http://www.savethechildren.org/publications/mothers/2008/SOWM-2008-full-report.pdf]
Press Freedom Index: 120 out of 169 countries. [http://www.rsf.org/article.php3?id_article=24025]
Women's index: 64 out of 71 countries.[http://www.savethechildren.org/publications/mothers
/2008/SOWM-2008-full-report.pdf]
Indian Rich- World Wealth Report 2010
1. India now has 126,700 HNWIs, an increase of more than 50% over the 2008 number. HNWIs, in this context, are defined as those having investable assets of $1 million or more, excluding primary residence, collectibles, consumables, and consumer durables.
2. Just over 120,000 in number, or 0.01% of the population, their combined worth is close to one-third of India's Gross National Income (GNI).
3. At the peak of the recession in 2008, India had 84,000 HNWIs with a combined net worth of $310 billion.
4. It would take an average urban Indian 2,238 years, based on the monthly per capita expenditure estimates in the 2007-8 National Sample Survey, to achieve a net worth equal to that of the average HNWI. And that's assuming that this average urban Indian just accumulates all his income without consuming anything.
5. A similar calculation shows that an average rural Indian would have to wait a fair bit longer — 3,814 years!
6. The HNWI population in India is also expected to be more than three times its 2008 size by the year 2018.
7. An estimated 13.6 million more people in India became poor or remained in poverty than would have been the case had the 2008 growth rates continued, according to the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA).
8. The wealth is being spent on passion, art and luxury collection, which has increased from 27 per cent to 30 per cent.
Source: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/India/Rich-getting-richer-120k-Indian...
Report: http://www.capgemini.com/insights-and-resources/by-publication/world-wea...
Internet in Rural India
1. A seven-state survey that tracked rural internet awareness shows that about 84% were ignorant of the medium's existence. As per the primary research, there are 3.8 Mn claimed Internet users in the rural villages in these states.In these 7 states, there are 2.6 Mn active Internet users.
2. Of those who make use of the net, 85% access emails, 67% watch video and listen to music and 48% conduct educational research. Interestingly about 13% utilize the internet to know about latest farming techniques and 8% to find about fertilizers.
3. It shows that as compared to 2008, there is a 26.7% rise in the number of 'active' rural internet users in 2009: from 3.3 million in 2008 to 4.2 million in 2009. Those who have used the internet once or more in the past one month qualify as "active" users.
4. For All India, the number of Claimed Internet users is 6.46 Mn and there are 4.18 Mn Active Internet users. The Internet penetration for Rural India has increased from 0.97% in 2008 to 1.13% in 2009.
5.By the year 2010, the total number of Internet users in rural villages is will grow to 7.7 Mn of which 5.4 Mn will be Active Internet users resulting in 30% growth from the year 2009.
6. More than 70% of rural users access Internet through CSCs/cyber cafés. People, however, access cyber cafes that are located at distances greater than 10 km away, many more times than those possibly within 10 km of their village.
Source: http://www.iamai.in/Upload/Research/Internet_for_Rural_India_44.pdf
Internet in India
1. 71 million people claimed to have used internet in 2009.
2. Active users, those who use internet at least once a month according the international standards of reckoning, rose from 42 million in September 2008 to 52 million in September 2009.
3. Internet usage has gone up from 9.3 hrs/week to 15.7 hrs/week .



Source: http://www.iamai.in/PRelease_Detail.aspx?nid=2045&NMonth=4&NYear=2010
Pending cases in India
1. Indian judiciary would take 320 years to clear the backlog of 31.28 million cases pending in various courts including High courts in the country.
2. Every judge in the country will have an average load of about 2,147 cases.
3. India has 14,576 judges as against the sanctioned strength of 17,641 including 630 High Court Judges. This works out to a ratio of 10.5 judges per million population.
4. The Apex court in 2002 had suggested 50 judges per million population.
Source: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Courts-will-take-320-years-to-c...
The Law Commission in its 120th Report recommended that the strength of judges per million population may be increased from 10.5 to 50 judges. The present judge strength in India is 14 per million population (approx.). Government has already increased the Judge strength in the High Courts by 152.
With regard to subordinate judiciary, the Supreme court, in its judgement of 21st March, 2002, in All India Judges’ Association & Ors Vs. Union of India & Ors., directed that an increase in the Judge strength from the existing 10.5 per 10 lakh people to 50 judges per 10 lakh people should be effected and implemented within a period of five years in a phased manner to be determined and directed by the Union Ministry of Law. The Central Government have filed an affidavit in the Supreme Court praying that the increase in judge strength in the Union Territories for which Central Government is administratively responsible be allowed based on workload and pendency of cases. The matter is sub-judice. As directed by the apex court, the Central Government also filed an affidavit indicating the quantum of funds required in compliance of the aforesaid Supreme Court’s judgement irrespective of the category of funds that will be drawn.
All State Governments are also party to this case. Under article 235 of the Constitution of India, the administrative control over the members of subordinate judiciary in the States vests with the concerned High Court and the State Government. Accordingly, the Central Government has requested all the State Governments for taking necessary action to increase the judge strength as per the direction of the Supreme Court and also to fill up the vacant posts of judicial officers on urgent basis.
Middle Class in IndiaAsian Development Bank 2010 Report
1. Vast majority of this middle class earns between Rs 1,000 and Rs 2,000 per person per month.
2. Only 0.0009% of Indians earn more than Rs 10,000 per month.
3. India will have a billion strong Middle Class by 2030.
4. The ADB report defines the middle class as those earning between $2 and $20 per person per day, measured in international dollars, ie adjusted for purchasing power parity. The ADB splitted the middle class into three sub-sections: lower middle class ($2 - $4), middle middle ($4 - $10) and upper middle ($10 - $20).
5. The vast majority of the Indian middle class 82% of it, or 224 million people - however, fit into the first category.
6. Since $1 PPP is Rs 17.256, this means that the vast majority of the Indian middle class earns between Rs 1035 and Rs 2070.
7. The ADB report shows that middle-class Indians systematically define themselves as poorer than they actually are in surveys.
Report: http://www.adb.org/Documents/Books/Key_Indicators/2010/pdf/KI2010-Specia...
http://www.adb.org/Documents/Books/Key_Indicators/2010/pdf/IND.pdf
Source: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Most-of-Indian-middle-class-ear...
Mobile phone connections - 2010
1. India's mobile phone market added 18.98 million new subscribers to its network in October, taking the total number of connections to 706.69 million.
2. According to the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI), the wireless phone user base grew 2.76 percent to 706.69 million in October from 687.71 million in the previous month.
3. The total telephone subscriber base in the country, both wireless and wireline connections combined, touched 742.12 million. The overall tele-density reached 62.51 percent.
4. The growth in India's wireless phone category was led by Bharti Airtel, which added three million users to take its subscriber base to 146 million users.
Vodafone Essar was next with 2.49 million new subscribers, that raised its subscriber base to 118 million, while new telecom player Uninor added 2.48 million connections, toting up 13.74 milion subscribers.
5. The broadband subscriber base grew 2.24 percent from 10.29 million in September to 10.52 million in October 2010.
6. Wireline subscriber base declined from 35.57 million in September-2010 to 35.43 million at the end of October 2010.
7. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd (BSNL) and Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd (MTNL), the two state-run operators, hold 83.31 percent of the wireline market share.
Source: http://www.hindustantimes.com/News-Feed/sectorsinfotech/India-has-706-mi...
Report: http://www.trai.gov.in/annualreport/AnnualReport_09_10English.pdf
The total
mobile subscriber base has increased from 56.88 million in March 2005 to 261.08
million in March 2008.The details of mobile phone subscriber base during the
last three years and the current year along with the growth rate, State-wise,
year-wise are given below:
Circle/State-wise details of Mobile phones for the last three years w.e.f. 31.03.2005
|
Sr. No. |
Name of |
Total |
Growth |
|||||
|
31.03.2005 |
31.03.2006 |
31.03.2007 |
31.03.2008 |
2005-06 |
2006-07 |
2007-08 |
||
|
1 |
Andaman & Nicobar |
10740 |
32587 |
44083 |
57846 |
203.42 |
35.28 |
31.22 |
|
2 |
Andhra Pradesh |
4251239 |
7669812 |
13045794 |
20577632 |
80.41 |
70.09 |
57.73 |
|
3 |
Assam |
287002 |
1128597 |
2331898 |
3913099 |
293.24 |
106.62 |
67.81 |
|
4 |
Bihar |
1158534 |
3819442 |
5773370 |
10869459 |
229.68 |
51.16 |
88.27 |
|
5 |
Chhattisgarh |
117951 |
191417 |
467294 |
701032 |
62.29 |
144.12 |
50.02 |
|
6 |
Gujarat |
4239010 |
6775707 |
11163757 |
16968200 |
59.84 |
64.76 |
51.99 |
|
7 |
Haryana |
1252666 |
2240298 |
4470606 |
6401457 |
78.84 |
99.55 |
43.19 |
|
8 |
Himachal |
354255 |
728578 |
1408876 |
2299811 |
105.66 |
93.37 |
63.24 |
|
9 |
Jammu & Kashmir |
274821 |
1114652 |
1491315 |
2201912 |
305.59 |
33.79 |
47.65 |
|
10 |
Jharkhand |
206372 |
403371 |
571217 |
640229 |
95.46 |
41.61 |
12.08 |
|
11 |
Karnataka |
3913203 |
6890546 |
11382511 |
17043556 |
76.08 |
65.19 |
49.73 |
|
12 |
Kerala |
2826014 |
5019928 |
7601981 |
11698216 |
77.63 |
51.44 |
53.88 |
|
13 |
Madhya Pradesh |
1871031 |
3441142 |
6682326 |
12491306 |
83.92 |
94.19 |
86.93 |
|
14 |
Maharashtra (-) |
4657918 |
7417194 |
12788896 |
21079326 |
59.24 |
72.42 |
64.83 |
|
15 |
North East |
146606 |
500935 |
1201518 |
2118532 |
241.69 |
139.86 |
76.32 |
|
16 |
Orissa |
762996 |
2172208 |
2963261 |
5180156 |
184.69 |
36.42 |
74.81 |
|
17 |
Punjab |
3763822 |
5461829 |
8364307 |
11715504 |
45.11 |
53.14 |
40.07 |
|
18 |
Rajasthan |
1852881 |
4147323 |
8011334 |
13586738 |
123.83 |
93.17 |
69.59 |
|
19 |
Tamil Nadu (-) Chennai |
3624160 |
5957147 |
10553554 |
18284050 |
64.37 |
77.16 |
73.25 |
|
20 |
Uttarakhand |
156467 |
321779 |
544882 |
685565 |
105.65 |
69.33 |
25.82 |
|
21 |
Uttar Pradesh |
4442433 |
9907365 |
17561905 |
28366704 |
123.02 |
77.26 |
61.52 |
|
22 |
West Bengal (-) Kolkata |
895338 |
2732985 |
5040111 |
9381095 |
205.25 |
84.42 |
86.13 |
|
23 |
Kolkata |
2019998 |
3502096 |
5030986 |
7844469 |
73.37 |
43.66 |
55.92 |
|
24 |
Chennai |
2228248 |
3246131 |
4637124 |
7061200 |
45.68 |
42.85 |
52.28 |
|
25 |
Delhi |
6073819 |
8869702 |
12083283 |
16282949 |
46.03 |
36.23 |
34.76 |
|
26 |
Mumbai |
5501404 |
8116905 |
9877466 |
13631670 |
47.54 |
21.69 |
38.01 |
|
Total |
56888928 |
101809676 |
165093655 |
261081713 |
78.96 |
62.16 |
58.14 |
|
Note: (1)
Source BSNL
/ MTNL / COAI / AUSPI.
<!--[if !supportLists]-->(2)
<!--[endif]-->Figures include WLL (F) also.
<!--[if !supportLists]-->(3)
<!--[endif]-->Private operators provide data service area wise
only and not separately for Andaman & Nicobar, Jharkhand, Uttarakhand, Chhattishgarh and NE-II which are included in West
Bengal, Bihar, Uttar
Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh and North East – I respectively. However, Bharti Airtel provides landline
figures separately for Chhattisgarh and Madhya
Pradesh
Telecom
Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) monitors the performance of mobile service
providers against the quality of service benchmarks notified in the Regulations
issued by TRAI, through quarterly Performance Monitoring Reports obtained from
telecom operators. TRAI also monitors the congestion at the point of
interconnection (POI) through monthly congestion report. The telecom service
providers are making efforts to improve the quality by continuously augmenting
their mobile network infrastructure and optimizing the same to meet the
specified standards set by TRAI.
This
information was given by the Minister of Communications and Information Technology, Shri A. Raja in a written reply to starred question in the Lok Sabha today.
This survey was conducted across three segments of Muslims - students of minority institutions, students of madrasas and the rest of the community. Respondents from minority colleges are denoted by a blue dot, those from madrasas by a green dot and the rest of India by a yellow dot.






Source: Thesundayindian.com
http://www.thesundayindian.com/article.php?category_id=7&article_id=10780#
Muslim representation in Police Force

Source: The Telegraph
http://www.telegraphindia.com/1100510/jsp/frontpage/story_12431527.jsp
Distribution of Population of each Religion by Caste Categories
|
Religion |
SCs |
STs |
OBCs |
Others |
|
Hindu |
22.2 |
9.1 |
42.8 |
26.0 |
|
Muslim |
0.8 |
0.5 |
39.2 |
59.5 |
|
Christians
|
9.0 |
32.8 |
24.8 |
33.3 |
|
Sikhs
|
30.7 |
0.9 |
22.4 |
46.1 |
|
Jains
|
0.0 |
2.6 |
3.0 |
94.3 |
|
Buddhists
|
89.5 |
7.4 |
0.4 |
2.7 |
|
Zoroastrians
|
0.0 |
15.9 |
13.7 |
70.4 |
|
Others
|
2.6 |
82.5 |
6.2 |
8.7 |
|
Total |
19.7 |
8.5 |
41.1 |
30.8 |
Trends in Population Shares and Growth, India, 1961-2001

Muslim Population in Selected states-2001

No. of Districts by Muslim Population Size and Concentration, 2001 Census
|
Muslim Population in the |
Number of districts |
Percentage of Muslims in |
Number of districts
|
|
1,000,000 or more |
25 |
75 or more |
9 |
|
500,000 to 999,999 |
51 |
50 or more but less than 75 |
11 |
|
250,000 to 499,999 |
104 |
25 or more but less than 50 |
38
|
|
100,000 to 249,999 |
125 |
10 or more but less than 25 |
182
|
|
50,000 to 99,999 |
87 |
5 or more but less than 10 |
129
|
|
10,000 to 49,999 |
95 |
1 or more but less than 5 |
147 |
|
Less than 10,000 |
106 |
Less than 1 |
77 |
|
Total |
593 |
Total |
593
|
Age-Sex Distribution of All Population and Muslim Population, India, 2001 (Percentage)
|
Age Group |
All religious |
Muslim |
||
|
Male |
Female |
Male |
Female |
|
|
0-4 |
10.7 |
10.7 |
12.4 |
12.7 |
|
5-9 |
12.5 |
12.4 |
14.7 |
14.7 |
|
10-14 |
12.3 |
11.9 |
14.0 |
13.7 |
|
15-19 |
10.1 |
9.3 |
10.8 |
10.1 |
|
20-24 |
8.7 |
8.8 |
8.7 |
8.6 |
|
25-29 |
7.8 |
8.4 |
7.2 |
7.8 |
|
30-34 |
7.0 |
7.4 |
6.3 |
6.7 |
|
35-39 |
6.8 |
7.0 |
6.1 |
6.3 |
|
40-44 |
5.6 |
5.2 |
4.9 |
4.5 |
|
45-49 |
4.7 |
4.5 |
3.9 |
3.8 |
|
50-54 |
3.7 |
3.4 |
3.1 |
2.7 |
|
55-59 |
2.6 |
2.8 |
2.0 |
2.3 |
|
60-64 |
2.6 |
2.8 |
2.1 |
2.2 |
|
65 |
4.5 |
5.0 |
3.5 |
3.8 |
|
Age |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
|
Total |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
District-wise Concentration of Muslim Population

Trends in Sex Ratio, All Population and Muslim Population, India, 1961-2001

Child Sex Ratio (females aged 0-5 years per 1,000 Males aged 0-5 years) by SRCs, 1998-99

Child Sex Ratio (females aged 0-5 years per 1,000 males aged 0-5 years) among SRCs by region, 1998-99

Percent change in Child Sex Ratio (females aged 0-5 per 1,000 males aged 0-5) between 1992-93 and 1998-99, by SRC's

Trend in Urbanisation, All Population and Muslim Population, India, 1961-2001

Infant and under-five mortality rates (per 1,000 live births) by SRC's, 1998-99

Mortality among SRC's, by Geographical Region, 1998-99

Percent Decline in Infant and Under-five Mortality Rates among SRC's, 1993-94 to 1998-99

Religious Differentials in Fertility, India

Contraceptive Prevalence Rate, India

Large States Classified according to Level of Fertility and Share of Muslim Population,India, NFHS-2
|
Level of fertility |
Range |
All |
Muslim |
|
Moderately High |
Greater than 4.0 but Less than/equal to 5.0 |
|
Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar |
|
Moderate |
Greater than 3.0 but Less than/equal to 4.0 |
Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh |
INDIA, Madhya Pradesh, West Bengal, Maharashtra, |
|
Moderately Low |
Greater |
INDIA, |
Karnataka, |
|
Low |
Less than/equal to 2.2 |
Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Kerala |
|
Percentage of children under 5 who are Underweight and Stunted and% of low birth weight (<2,500 gms) babies, mong Muslims and non-Muslims, 1998-99

Percentage of children under 5 who are Underweight and Stunted among SRC's, by geographical region, 1998-99

Literacy by Place of Residence

Literacy Levels in Andhra Pradesh

Literates as Proportion of Population by Age Groups - 2004-05
|
Age Group |
Hindus |
Muslims |
Other Minorities |
||
|
Gen |
OBC |
SCs/STs |
|||
|
6-13 years |
90.2 |
80.8 |
74.7 |
74.6 |
88.5 |
|
14-15 years |
95.7 |
87.5 |
80.0 |
79.5 |
91.9 |
|
16-17 years |
95.0 |
85.2 |
78.6 |
75.5 |
91.3 |
|
18-22 years |
91.4 |
76.9 |
65.0 |
70.5 |
85.8 |
|
23 years & above |
74.0 |
50.6 |
36.5 |
46.1 |
67.0 |
|
Total |
80.5 |
63.4 |
52.7 |
59.9 |
75.2 |
All India - Literacy rates by Social Groups – 2001


Mean Years of Schooling of Children aged 7-16 years (2001)

Current Enrolment Rates 1999-00 and 2004-05

Differences in Attendance (Enrolment) Levels between Muslims and All Others

Incidence of Never Attended and Drop-Outs

Percentage Attainment Levels in SRCs

All India - Matriculation (Completion Rates)


Percentage of Muslim Children in JNVST

Graduates and Diploma Holders by SRCs
|
SRCs |
Number (in lakhs) |
Percentage of 20 years+Population |
Distribution across SRCs |
|||
|
Graduates |
Diploma and Certificates |
Graduates |
Diploma and Certificates |
Graduates |
Diploma and Certificates |
|
|
Total |
376.7 |
40.5 |
6.7 |
0.7 |
100 |
100 |
|
Muslim |
23.9 |
2.7 |
3.6 |
0.4 |
6.3 |
6.8 |
|
SCs/STs |
30.8 |
4.1 |
2.4 |
0.3 |
8.2 |
10.2 |
|
All Others |
322 |
33.7 |
8.8 |
0.9 |
85.5 |
83.0 |
Graduates from among age 20+ by SRCs: 2004-05

Graduates + as Percentage of 20+ Population: 2004-05

Technical Graduates as Percentage of 20+Population: 2004-05

Diplomas as Percentage to 20+Population: 2004-05

All India - Graduation (Completion Rates)

Graduates as Proportion of Population by Age Groups - All India, 2004-05
|
Age Group |
Hindus |
Muslims |
Other Minorities |
||
|
Gen |
OBCs |
SCs/STs |
|||
|
20-30 years |
18.6 |
6.5 |
3.3 |
4.5 |
11.6 |
|
30-40 years |
16.8 |
4.6 |
2.3 |
3.3 |
9.2 |
|
40-50 years |
14.6 |
3.2 |
|||