the precise time for the birth of nationalism is still adebatable point in india.but it is only clear after 1850 that we see a series of leaders whether kings nawabs educated men like nauroji, gandhi, birth of congress, such other incidents point towards the nationalist movement looking at the british rule as alienand against the country. your assumption seems that muslims kings before 1850 were great nationals.im sorry u have forgotten to add another word before nationalist muslim kings or nawabs that word is "anti". india was divided into two countries due to muslims, how can u say muslims that were nationalists. the real nationalists were hindus that is why they fought for united india and maintains neutral stance in religioius affairs, what are pakistanis and bangladeshis doing is that they are islamist their whole country must be islamic.dont ever use nationalism with muslims. ur whole idea is to kill other religions and set up ur moss like green colour islam on others. go to mysore and ask a common man he will tell u how much anti national he was and how he raped women and destroyed the temples of the natives. dont call him a national . muslims are muslims they cannot come out of that either kings or common people. u are callings the descendants of ghazni, ghoris, taimur as nationalists. i also advise u to take refuge in sophism. and become asophist in greece.