Muslim options for Babri case
FREE REPRINTS
Unless otherwise noted, you can republish our articles for free. You just have to credit TwoCircles.net and link it back to us, and you can’t edit our material or sell it separately. (We're licensed under Creative Commons, which provides the legal details.). For publishing TwoCircles.net photos please contact info@twocircles.net.
If need be, the parliament
If need be, the parliament will pass a law to make a temple there. Although, we're sure, Supreme Court itself will hand over the land for the temple, as there is plethora of irrefutable Archeological evidence, which even Jutice S U Khan could not deny!
Muslim View over Babri Case
Really Muslim are decieved under the name of Justice............Their no way for Muslims to share the Waqf Estate properties with any communities.........And the judgement was hoax for Muslim because Judgement was not based on law as it was based on Hindus faith............I'can say it's most in appropriate justice in the history of Law.
It does not matter
@ Saddam Malik
You can keep you view yourself. It does not matter.
It does not matter
@ Saddam Malik
You can keep you view yourself. It does not matter.
Muslim Options for Babri Case
Why fight for lost cause, there is so much to achieve in future. Rather than be bogged down by old fights, it is better if you reach for future. If you see the world around you, the west has acheived so much in scientific development that if is ruling the world. With all the riches the Middle east is just the puppet in the hands of west. Education and scientific development is the crux of happiniess.
Islam true happiness.
Islam ideological superpower along with superior military technology and Janbaz muslim army is the need of the hour to destroy evil polytheistic ideologies.
russians although are advanced in science and technology couldnot sustain due to lack of islamic ideology.
Islam true happiness.
Islam ideological superpower along with superior military technology and Janbaz muslim army is the need of the hour to destroy evil polytheistic ideologies.
russians although are advanced in science and technology couldnot sustain due to lack of islamic ideology.
hume ye faisla manzur nhi
अदालत जो फैसला दिया वो इंसाफ का फैसला नही था हमे जान्भुज कर हराया गया हे और अदालत ने देश में हमारी हेसियत का हमे बता दिया हे कितनी हे
अदालत को ये नज़र नही आया की वहां १९९२ में मस्जिद शहीद की गयी थी लेकिन उसे ये दिखा की राम का जन्म वही पर हुआ था बाल्मीकि से लेकर तुलसीदास तक को राम का जन्म स्थान पता नही था इन लोगो को पता चल गया ये फैसला नही मुस्लिमो का अपमान हे और हम किसी भी कीमत पर हार नही मानेंगे अदालत ने फैसला उन आतंकियों के हक में दिया हे जो राम को जानते ही नही जानते तो इतनी मार काट न करते खुद त्याग दे देते ये वो लोग हे जो इंसानियत के दुश्मन हे ये लोग हिन्दू भी नही हे क्योकि हिदू धर्म भी हिंसा के खिलाफ हे अयोध्या के नाम पर एक साजिश के तहत मुस्लिमो का दमन हुआ और नफरत की राजनीति की गयी सत्ता सुख भी पाया गया मुदाबाद में हम मरे हम चुप rhe भागलपुर में हमे मारा गया हम चुप रहे गुजरात में हमे बेआबरू किया गया हमे जिंदा जलाया गया हमारी बहनों की इज्ज़त लुटी गयी पोलिसे ने इन दुश्मनों का साथ दिया हम चुप रहे हमारे ही घरो को जला कर हमे ही आतंकवादी बताया गया हम चुप रहे लेकिन अब सब्र का बाँध टूट गया हे अब तक हम सोचते थे हमे इन्साफ मिलेगा लेकिन वहां भी हमे मज़ाक बनाया गया आस्था पर अदालते काम करने लगी कानून को खेल बन गया सविधान अपमानित कर दिया इन अदालतों ने अब हम चुप नही रहेंगे अब हम भी सियासी वजूद में आकर अपना हक हासिल करेंगे
Law is not convenience of muslims
@anonymous
If the verdict is not in favour muslims will revolt, ok if it is not in favour of hindus, hindus can also revolt. Talk sense rather than into a destructive note
If you are referring to SHAH BANU case...
"satwagunam" @ 19 October 2010 - 10:41 pm. under title: Law is not.....
If you are referring to SHAH BANU case, where the SUPREME COURT up-held "justice" referring MPL (Muslim Personal Law), the "honourable" court DID UPHELD "JUSTICE".
There is no Hindu Personal Law as I know. If there is any ((without jhagdaa, dispute OR misunderstanding from different sects)), please let Judiciary know about it, and let the readers of TCN platform become aware of it's presence.
Convenience OR Inconvenience IS NOT the ISSUE. The issue is JUSTICE and INJUSTICE. Remember this and "jog" it down in your dumb-head, removing any KUUDA, KARKAT of RELIGIOUS BIAS.
Centuries of INJUSTICE by Brahmins, against indigeneous inhabitants of India DID NOT WORK. Now you want to take those UPON WHOM you DID INJUSTICE under CASTE SYSTEM to your side??? Aanh !! Sorry, most of those wise men/women converted to other religions, because of YOUR centuries OLD prejudices / injustices / caste-discrimination / hatred / religious bias / etc. etc. etc.
Bhajpaa / Sangh Parivaar has now started KILLING even Liberal Hindus, who stand for truth and justice. I don't wish to mention their names - time and again. Readers know whom I am referring to ?
Constitutional GUARANTEE always is ABOVE LAW. Don't try to DOWN-PLAY Indian Constitution. Law can be manipulated AND purchased to suit one's NEEDS / WISHES, with money - "but not" the CONSTITUTION ! If in doubt, ask Raam Jethmalani - the "highest paid" and "MOST-REPUTED" Lawyer. Even he, will be POWERLESS, when a question of CONSTITUTIONAL Guarantee, is raised.
An Indian
belief vs. judgement
@ An Indian
Ofcourse, i am referring to shah bhano case. It was clear case were the rajiv gandhi government had buckled to the pressure of muslim to their faith vs judiciary. I would say it is great and hindus have learned lesson from this and other countries, that with majority your faith is equal to law and that is equal to judiciary.
Further please answer the question, how will supreme uphold the claim when mplb claim on title deed has been thrown out under law of expiration. When mplb does not have right for land where is the quesiton of structure sound logical.
If Allahabad High Court Verdict stands valid...
"satwa gunam" Mahashay !
I questioned earlier, under an article written by Dr. Syed Khalid Iqbal Haider, and also questioned our learned Ludhiana Advocate Mr. Soonch to clarify my understanding / application of JUDGEMENT. And here is the article and my comment, if you missed to read:
http://twocircles.net/2010oct15/justice_awaited.html
Now, if you CONSIDER YOURSELF to be MORE LEARNED and WISE - please write "whether OR not", my understanding of the Verdict is correct?
Thank you IN ADVANCE for your clarification.
An Indian
Violation of OATH by Judiciary
Allahabad High Court Verdict of Sept. 30 2010 is a GROSS VIOLATION of OATH taken by Judiciary.
When POLITICIANS "violate" the OATH - it is beginning signs of DECAYING of a country.
But when JUDICIARY "violate" the OATH - it is a DEFINITE SIGN that a COUNTRY is GOING DOWNHILL, without BREAK.
There is STILL TIME for SUPREME COURT to make a COURSE-CORRECTION, before final descent.
An Indian
Go to supreme court and
Go to supreme court and realize whether India is a secular democracy or Hindu Rashtra? and later after its verdict we will decide whether to abide by the secular constitution or revolt against hypocritical pseudo secular constituition?
Post new comment