Iqra Fatma, TwoCircles.net
New Delhi: On September 11, a sense of urgency gripped Hyderabad as MP Asaduddin Owaisi who made a fervent appeal, urging people to oppose the recently introduced Waqf Amendment Bill, 2024. Describing the proposed legislation as “oppressive and unconstitutional,” he issued a statement via a video clip that rapidly circulated among concerned citizens.
The bill, which had been introduced in the Lok Sabha on August 8, 2024, seeks to amend the 1995 Waqf Act, fundamentally altering the management and oversight of waqf properties. These properties, integral to Islamic charitable traditions, encompass mosques, madras, khanqahs (hospice), graveyards and agricultural lands dedicated for religious and public welfare purposes.
The All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen chief’s call to action urged citizens to voice their objections before the deadline of September 13.
The new legislation, proposed to be renamed the Unified Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency and Development Act, 2024, is touted by the Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)-led National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government in the Centre as a comprehensive reform aimed at increasing the efficiency of waqf property management. The bill introduces several key changes, including the inclusion of non-Muslims in Waqf Boards and a significant shift in the power dynamics overseeing these properties.
Owaisi’s criticism centres on the perceived threat to the autonomy of Muslim religious institutions. He accused the Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government of attempting to seize waqf properties through the amendment, thus encroaching upon religious rights. The bill, he argued, would diminish the authority of Waqf Boards, making them mere “mute spectators” while the central government exerts greater control.
To facilitate the public’s objections, the lawmaker highlighted the role of the All-India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB), which had provided a QR code to streamline the submission process. He encouraged people to use their phones to scan the code, draft their objections via email and submit them before the impending deadline. The QR code, he mentioned, would be available in mosques, and local Members of the Legislative Assembly (MLAs) would participate in Friday prayers to further mobilise the community.
The 1995 Waqf Act
The central government introduced a Bill in the Lok Sabha on August 8 to amend the 1995 Waqf Act. The proposed amendments aim to significantly reform the law by increasing the Centre’s regulatory authority over waqf properties and, for the first time, allowing the inclusion of non-Muslim members in Waqf Boards.
The draft legislation, proposed to be renamed the Unified Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency and Development Act, 2024, is described by the government as a comprehensive overhaul intended to enhance “the efficiency of the administration and management of the waqf properties”.
However, several Opposition parties have accused the Centre of introducing the Bill without adequate consultation with stakeholders, claiming it encroaches upon the Muslim community’s religious rights. They have also argued that the amendments will reduce Waqf Boards to “mute spectators” while the Centre infringes upon various religious freedoms.
In Islamic law, waqf refers to property dedicated to God for religious and charitable purposes. This can include any movable or immovable property set aside for the public good, representing an act of piety that allows Muslims to extend their charitable deeds beyond their lifetime.
A waqf can be established through a formal deed or instrument, or a property can be deemed waqf if it has been used for religious or charitable purposes over an extended period. The proceeds from such properties are typically used to maintain mosques, fund schools or provide for the poor.
However, once designated as waqf, the property cannot be transferred through inheritance, sold or given away. Non-Muslims are also permitted to create a waqf as long as the objective aligns with Islamic principles.
In India, waqfs are regulated by the 1995 Act. Waqf properties are identified and delineated through a survey conducted by state governments. A survey commissioner, appointed under the Act, identifies these properties through local investigations, witness testimonies and the review of public documents. Once identified, the properties are recorded in the State’s official gazette, and a list is maintained by the State Waqf Board. Each waqf is managed by a mutawalli (custodian) who oversees its administration. Although similar to a trust established under the Indian Trusts Act of 1882, a waqf, unlike a trust, cannot be dissolved by a Board.
The 1995 Act establishes Waqf Boards in each State to oversee the administration of waqf properties within their jurisdiction. These Boards are considered juristic persons, allowing them to sue or be sued in a court of law. Each State Waqf Board has a chairperson and includes one or two nominees from the State government, Muslim legislators, recognised Islamic scholars and mutawallis of the waqfs.
The Act also mandates the appointment of a full-time chief executive officer for each Board, who must be a Muslim by faith and hold at least the rank of deputy secretary in the State government. The Waqf Board is authorised to manage waqf properties and take measures to recover lost assets. It can also sanction the transfer of immovable waqf property through sale, gift, mortgage, exchange or lease.
However, this requires the approval of at least two-thirds of the Board members. Amendments to the 1995 Act in 2013 further strengthened the Board’s authority and made the sale of waqf properties nearly impossible, as neither the mutawalli nor the Board had the right to sell a waqf property.
In addition to the State Waqf Boards, the legislation also establishes the Central Waqf Council — a national advisory body under the Ministry of Minority Affairs. The Council ensures uniform administration of waqf properties across the country and is headed by the Union Minister of Minority Affairs. It also advises the Union government on waqf-related issues, including policy development, implementation of waqf laws and resolution of inter-State disputes.
Contentious aspects of proposed amendments
Key changes in the proposed law include alterations to the definition of ‘waqf’. Under the Bill, only lawful property owners who have practiced Islam for at least five years are authorized to create ‘waqf’ properties through formal deeds. This revision abolishes the ‘waqf by use’ concept — which allowed a property to be considered waqf based on usage, even if the original deed was disputed. Traditionally, waqf properties were often dedicated orally until formal documentation became standard practice.
To prevent fraudulent waqf claims, the Bill stipulates, “Any government property identified or declared as waqf property, before or after the commencement of this Act, shall not be recognized as waqf property.” Additionally, the law permits widows, divorced women, and orphans to be beneficiaries of proceeds from waqf assets.
Another significant change involves the power being reposed in district collectors. The responsibility of surveying waqf properties, previously managed by survey commissioners under the 1995 Act, will now be assigned to district collectors or officers of equivalent rank.
To improve the accuracy of waqf property records, the Bill proposes a centralised registration system. All information about waqf properties must be uploaded to this portal within six months of the new law’s enactment. Moreover, any new waqf property registrations must be submitted exclusively through this portal to the Waqf Boards.
Notably, the Bill omits Section 40, which previously granted waqf tribunals the authority to determine whether a property qualifies as waqf. Instead, it designates the district collector as the final arbiter in such matters. Once a determination is made, the collector must update the revenue records and submit a report to the State government.
However, the Bill specifies that the disputed property cannot be treated as a waqf property until the collector submits his final report. This implies that until the government decides the issue, a Waqf Board cannot control the disputed land.
One of the most contentious aspects of the Bill is the proposed inclusion of non-Muslims in key waqf institutions — the Central Waqf Council, the State Waqf Boards and waqf tribunals. It empowers the Centre to appoint three Members of Parliament (two from the Lok Sabha and one from the Rajya Sabha) to the Central Waqf Council without specifying that they must be Muslims.
Under the 1995 Act, the three MPs to be included in the Council had to be from the Muslim community.
Similarly, the new Bill mandates that State Waqf Boards include two non-Muslims and two women as members. The composition of waqf tribunals has been changed from a three-member body to a two-member body. The tribunal will now consist of a district judge and an officer of joint secretary rank to the State government.
Under the proposed law, tribunals must resolve disputes within six months, with a possible extension of an additional six months.
The Bill also empowers the Centre to “direct the audit of any waqf at any time by an auditor appointed by the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India, or by any officer designated by the Central Government for that purpose”. Waqf Boards are required to audit their accounts annually, selecting auditors from a panel constituted by the State governments. Penalties will be levied upon mutawallis if they fail to maintain proper accounts.
The proposed law allows courts to intervene in waqf disputes. It removes the finality of decisions made by waqf tribunals, allowing aggrieved parties to appeal directly to the concerned High Court. This is aimed at increasing judicial oversight and curbing instances of arbitrary exercise of power by Waqf Boards or tribunals.
Professor Faizan Mustafa, noted academician and vice chancellor of the Chanakya National Law University, Patna, said that while the amendments are a positive step, it is crucial to implement measures that adequately protect waqf properties without infringing upon the freedom of religion guaranteed under Article 25 of the Constitution. “Rights vested in waqf properties hundreds of years ago cannot be taken over by executive officers without fair judicial determination,” he added.
He also noted that the increased centralisation of waqf property management might undermine the autonomy of Muslim religious institutions. While welcoming the inclusion of non-Muslims and women in waqf governance, Mustafa questioned, “Will non-Hindus be allowed on Hindu temple boards in States such as Tamil Nadu, Kerala, and Karnataka?”
He further asserted that excessive government control is at odds with the principles of economic liberalisation.
After its introduction in Parliament, the Bill was referred to a joint parliamentary committee for further scrutiny following opposition from the Congress-led Indian National Democratic Inclusive Alliance, which opposed the proposed law in its present form.
In March last year, the Union government informed the Delhi High Court that close to 120 petitions challenging various provisions of the 1995 Act are pending before courts across the country.