Abusaleh Shariff explodes the myth of Muslims doing better under Modi ruleShahabuddin to Govt: Assert you’ll implement final court order on Babri
Submitted by admin3 on 21 November 2009 - 8:00pm
By TwoCircles.net News Desk,
New Delhi: In view of the deliberate confusing statement by RSS Sangh Sarchalak Mohan Bhagwat regarding Babri Masjid case in court, ex-MP and convener of Babari Masjid Movement Coordination Committee (BMCC) Syed Shahabuddin has urged the UPA Government in the Centre to “make a clear and emphatic public statement, preferably on the floor of the Parliament, that the Government is bound by the Constitution to implement the final judicial verdict.”
Mohan Bhagwat in an interview to India Today weekly said there is no case related to the land of Babri Masjid. He has also rejected the idea of a Masjid along with a Mandir in Ayodhya.
Referring to the interview, Syed Shahabuddin said: “Sri Bhagwat has invented a ‘non-existing case’ pending for 90 years. On the other hand he ignores the title suit which is currently in the last stage of hearing by the Special Bench of the Allahabad High Court, since 1996 and which is about to be decided.”
“In expressing opposition to ‘a Masjid in Ayodhya’ Sri Bhagwat rejects the Supreme Court ruling for the construction of both a Masjid and a Mandir in the Acquired Area,” former diplomat and the tallest figure on Babri issue Syed Shahabuddin said. He requested Sri Bhagwat “to disclose his plans about the scores of Masjids and Dargahs which exist in Ayodhya and of graveyards which lie within the Municipal limits.”
“The BMMCC would like to inform Sri Bhagwat that the Muslim Community has repeatedly committed itself to accept the final judicial verdict on title to the disputed site. No Hindu leader has made any such commitment which would serve the majesty of the law. Perhaps Sri Bhagwat supports the stand of the VHP and the Ram Janam Bhumi Nyas that they would accept the judicial verdict if it is in their favour, and not otherwise. The BMMCC requests Sri Bhagwat to clarify the stand of the Sangh Pariwar that if the title suit is decided already in favour of the Muslims, they will not interfere with the reconstruction of Masjid on the disputed site in accordance with the ruling of the Supreme Court. But Sri Bhagwat has obviously decided to defy the Supreme Court.”
“The BMMCC requests the Government to take note of the Sangh Parivar’s stand and make a clear and emphatic public statement, preferably on the floor of the Parliament, that the Government is bound by the Constitution to implement the final judicial verdict."
[Photo by http://alamsha.sulekha.com]
FREE REPRINTS
Unless otherwise noted, you can republish our articles for free. You just have to credit TwoCircles.net and link it back to us, and you can’t edit our material or sell it separately. (We're licensed under Creative Commons, which provides the legal details.). For publishing TwoCircles.net photos please contact info@twocircles.net.
Mr. sahabuddin be hopeful !
Mr. Shahabuddin must not rely much on the Congress government. As in the past also Narasimha government has promised to the courts on various level and Muslim community in large that no harm will be done to Babri Masjid. Even after the demolition of Masjid, the then prime Minister promised that Babri Masjid will rebuild, but all empty promises. Mr. Shahabuddin must understand the courts and the communal parties are issuing the statements and their strategy according the situation created in their favour by the government.
Matter already decided
For the information of all and sundry, a Mandir-like structure has already been constructed and functioning (with full government protection) at the disputed site of the erstwhile Babri Masjid.
In the guise of maintaining status quo as mandated by the court, the landscape has already undergone a change bit-by-bit. So, what remains is the construction of a proper Bhavya Mandir (large-scale temple) that shows the liberation of the Hindus (finally) from Islamic rule (sic).
Our enlightened media conveniently ignores this brazen violation of judicial orders, in which the entire legislative and bureaucratic branches are complicit.
Is there any clarity on many issues
Going by the current social upheavils culminating in beating up of senior journalists and ransacking of media houses, attacking elected legislators for not speaking particular language etc, it is very remote that the current dispensation is having courage to eevn think of anything which Janaab Shahabuddeen is asking for. The things have worsened so fast that there seems to be no difference in India and Pakistan. There are many emotional Indians who dismiss this comparision. Many times they may be true like the facilities to the policemen who were to guard the Taj Hotel in Bombay. We know what Taj Hotel stands for and what is the responsibility of the State in having security. Here in India now, those who can afford security, they are given at the expense of the exchequer while the poor and needy do not get even a fraction of their share. Many of my not so optimistic colleague feel that India is already in the mouth of dogs when I warn them about India going to the dogs.
If the ruling of the Apex Court is not accetable by the Hindus, how come many of them ask Muslims to sing "Wend Metarem". The mentality of defaults of being Indian need urgent demolition.
Post new comment