Stone pelting is un-Islamic: Kashmiri cleric
Submitted by admin4 on 10 March 2010 - 5:57pm
By IANS,
New Delhi : Terming stone pelting as a form of protest un-Islamic, the Grand Mufti of Jammu and Kashmir, Maulana Bashir-ud-Din, Wednesday said such violent practices were against the basic tenets of the religion whose essence is "peace and brotherhood".
"Islam strongly prohibits any means of violence. The stone pelting practice is surely un-Islamic. It causes inconvenience to people and propels more violence," the Grand Mufti told IANS here.
Bashir-ud-Din heads the Sharia court of Jammu and Kashmir and is also the president of the state Personal Law Board.
He is authorised to make decisions on Islamic law and issue fatwas - religious edicts.
Asked if he had issued a fatwa against stone pelting, which some separatists justify as a form of resistance, the mufti said: "What I am saying is not my personal opinion. I, as a Grand Mufti, am making it clear. When Islam doesn't advocate or justify any violence, how can you justify stone pelting? I am saying this in the light of Hadith (sayings of the Prophet) and the holy Quran.
"Islam is the religion of peace and brotherhood," he added, strongly condemning the practice which over the past two years has become a norm in the troubled state, especially on Fridays.
After the weekly Friday prayers, streets of downtown in Srinagar and parts of Lal Chowk surge with masked youths, mostly in their teens.
They throw stones at police and paramilitary personnel, triggering clashes. Security forces, in return, use tear gas and sometimes even open fire at the protestors.
Recently, a young boy in Old Srinagar was killed when he was hit by a tear gas shell. In another incident, a 10-day-old ailing baby died when a vehicle carrying him and his parents to a hospital was stopped by stone throwers in Kashmir's Baramulla district Feb 21.
The mufti said the stone pelting had taken a form of alternative employment in Jammu and Kashmir and the government needed to "nip the evil in the bud".
"They (stone throwers) are paid for what they are doing. What do you do about that? Give Kashmiri youth jobs so that they don't look for unlawful ways of earning," he said.
The mufti was in the national capital to meet Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, Congress president Sonia Gandhi and Home Minister P. Chidambaram.
"I will meet them to urge for a dialogue process with every shades of opinion in the state to solve the (Kashmir) issue," he said.
The mufti also condemned the killing of teenage Zahid Farooq, allegedly shot dead by Border Security Forces personnel last month. An official of the border guards has been arrested for the killing.
FREE REPRINTS
Unless otherwise noted, you can republish our articles for free. You just have to credit TwoCircles.net and link it back to us, and you can’t edit our material or sell it separately. (We're licensed under Creative Commons, which provides the legal details.). For publishing TwoCircles.net photos please contact info@twocircles.net.
What Mufti sahab
What Mufti sahab unfortunately forgot, I think, was to make it clear that the forceful occupation of Land by the State using all the available means to crush any uprising (usually violently), and not giving any rights to the people who call Kashmir their home to decide what they want, is also un-Islamic. Not just un-Islamic, it's inhumane. It's actually against the very basic idea of a democracy!
Hold plibiscite in Baluchistan before J&K.
The KING of Kashmir acceded to India like the KING of Patiala, Gwalior, Jaipur, Jodhpur etc and the people of non of these states got a plebiscite to decide on which country they want to join. Just because Paki Tribals supported by Paki Army invaded Kashmir and Kashmir has a Muslim Majority why must the accession of J&K to India be held any different?? The Khans of Baluchistan were forced to join Pakistan by Pakistan Army action. So if plebiscite is the demand of Pakistan let them hold one in Baluchistan before seeking it in Kashmir.
Post new comment