By Xinhua,
Los Angeles : California will become the first state in the United States to use DNA to try to identify elusive criminals through their relatives, the Los Angeles Times reported on Saturday.
The policy is aimed at identifying a suspect through DNA collected at a crime scene by looking for potential relatives in the state’s genetic database of about a million felons, according to the paper.
Once a relative is identified, police can use that person as a lead to trace the suspect, the report said.
The new approach was justified by violent crime plaguing the state, the report quoted state Attorney General Jerry Brown as saying.
He emphasized that it would be used only when all other leads had been exhausted.
“We have 2,000 murders a year in California — that is 10,000 since the Iraq war started — and that is a lot of killing,” Brown said. “When you see it and see the victims and have to go to funerals, it is pretty serious stuff.”
The new plan makes California a leader in such searches, which several states permit but do not vigorously pursue. Colorado has recently begun to examine its database for relatives of unknown criminals as part of a research project, according to the report.
The report said the policy, which takes effect immediately, is designed to work like this: The state’s crime lab will tell police about DNA profiles that come up during routine searches of California’s offender database and closely resemble, but do not match, the DNA left at a crime scene. (Previously, the state refused to tell police about these partial matches.)
The lab will then perform calculations and tests to determine the likelihood of a biological relationship between the person found in the database and the unknown offender believed to have left DNA at the crime scene.
When such partial matches do not surface or fail to produce a lead, a more customized familial search can be done in which computer software scans the database proactively for possible relatives. The software measures the chance of two people being related based on the rarity of the markers they share.
Once a relative has been identified, police can interview him or construct a family tree based on existing records. If a suspect is identified, police can obtain a warrant for his DNA, or even gather it surreptitiously from an abandoned drink or cigarette butt. The suspect’s DNA sample would then be compared to the crime scene sample and possibly used as evidence.
Civil libertarians oppose using DNA databases to search for relatives of unknown offenders, saying it puts family members under “genetic surveillance” for crimes they did not commit, the report said.
For now, all the people in the state’s database are convicted offenders, but the state plans to expand the database next year to include arrestees, heightening concerns over privacy, according to the report.