TMMK chief trashes Tamilnadu BJP chief’s lies about Babri Masjid

By TCN News,

Chennai: Professor M.H. Jawahirullah, president of Tamilnadu Muslim Munnetra Kazhagam (TMMK), has rejected the statement of Tamilnadu BJP president L.Ganesan regarding the Babri Masjid. Like his Sangh Parivar, Ganesan had said the mosque was built on the debris of Ram Temple in Ayodhya.

Ganesan had alleged that the Babri Mosque was built after razing down the Ram Temple which existed earlier. “L.Ganesan’s mud slinging against the facts of Babri Mosque is a vile attempt of reaping vengeance,” said Prof Jawahirullah. L.Ganesan’s false elaboration that Babri Mosque was built by Babar in the year 1526 after razing down the existent Ram Temple in commemoration of Babar’s victory is nothing but a blatant lie.”

Professor Jawahirullah said that when Babar invaded India, Sultan Ibrahim Lodhi was the ruler of Delhi. The Battle of Panipet was fought between Babar and Lodhi. However, both Babar’s as well as Lodhi’s armies composed of soldiers drawn from both Muslim and Hindu communities. Babar won the battle and then established the Moghul Empire.

“The allegation of L. Ganesan that Babri Masjid was constructed to commemorate Babar’ victory is a lie as the foundation stone for the Mosque was laid by Ibrahim Lodi in 1523. In the beginning the Mosque was known as Lodhi Mosque or Fort Mosque. While the Moghul Empire took root into Awdh province Babar’s Govenor Mir Baquee visited Ayodhya and saw a half finished Masjid. He completed the construction and renamed the Mosque as Babri Masjid,” Jawahirullah.

L. Ganesan’s contention that Babri Masjid was constructed on the debris of Ram Temple is wrong as prominent and established historians like R.S. Sharma, Sushil Srivastava and Sher Singh have after elaborate research established meticulously that there was no Ram Temple in the site where Babri Masjid was constructed. Besides a number of witnesses who lived during the period when Babri Masjid was constructed have also vouched for the fact that there was no Ram temple which was razed down by Babar to construct the Masjid. For example, Tulasidas the famous poet who translated and popularized Ramayan in Hindustani was a 30 year old youth living in Ayodhya when Babri Masjid was constructed. He has not written a single line in his masterpiece Shri Ramachandra Manas to condemn the destruction of a temple dedicated to his Lord as such an event did not take place at all. Besides, Guru Nanak visited Ayodhya during this period and though in his Guru Granth Sahib he criticizes Babar’s rule, he too has not blamed Babar as a ruler who destroyed Ram temple to construct a Mosque, Jawahirullah said.

“The hostile ill feeling of Britishers taken aghast and consternation on the first freedom fight in 1857, conspired in 1870 raising a platform in the campus of the Babri Mosque with a Ram’s statue. This is a known notorious fact.The concept of Babri Masjid site being Ramjanmabhoomi was a creation of the Britisher’s “Divide and Rule” policy.”

Babri Mosque which stood as symbol of secular democracy was pulled down with the coterie of RSS, Bajragndal, and BJP. Justice Liberhan’s commission vouches the facts.

Professor Jawahirullah expressed regret for the blatant lies, ignorance and vengeance of L.Ganesan.

L. Ganesan had also said that Babri Masjid is a national shame and Muslims should give consent to remove it as the Christians have not opposed the removal of the statutes of King Edward and King George in Chennai recently. Both these statutes were removed by the state Government as they were in the vicinity of the new state Assembly and Secretariat.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

BJP's fiction about Babri Masjid!

1. Authority on Ancient Indian History, Vincent Smith, has declared that trying to identify places on the basis of their situation on the banks of rivers in India will be a futile exercise, since rivers keep changing their courses! Recently R.Kosi did so.hence, R. Sarayu might have moved many kilometershence, asserting that the present Ayodhya was the same as that during Lord ram away from its course during LordRam;s birth year., is not valid!
2. "Babarnama" records that when the news was conveyed to Babar that Hindus revered "cow" as "Gowmata", he issued a 'firman' that cow slaughter should not be made in public places with a view NOT to wound the feelings of the Hindu citizens"!How, such a n Emperor, would stoop to the level of razing Ramjanmabhoomi Mandir to build a place of worship for His God?
3.Since idols were clandestinely placed inside the Masjid, Muslims refrained from offering namaz there pending court's decision.Even today, there are thousands od dilapidated and forsaken temples all over India,where no puja is peformed for many years. due to title fight among the trustees!Could one call ithem "disputed structures"?
4. Advani hijacked the "Ramjanmabhoomi Struggle" of VHP, with his 28-days "Rathyatra" from Somnath Temple to Samastipur, where he was arrested by Bihar CM< Lallu Prasad!Through this he gained a stature and made the issue a highly emotive for millions of gullible Hindus.Further, sangh parivar had mustered lakhs of persons as "kar sevaks" on 6th Decemnber, 1992, and had the 500 year old mosque demolished as per a neatly executed plan!
5. If they have wagon loads of proofs to establish that the masjid was built after demolishing the mandir,where was the need for 6/12?And how vital documents relating to the case have disappeared from UP secretariat?
6. Advani, who championed the cause of the mandir , was Home Minister and Deputy P.M. for six years (!998- 2004). What prevented him from building the promised mandir?As uma BVharathi has said, :He wanted the mandir issue to be "emotive" for the people and a "political"one for himself!"

Prof - what about Gyan wapi Mosque??

Proof exist about the Temple at Mathura and Varanasi having been destroyed by Muslims Rulers and Mosque- Gyan Vapi by AURANGI - built there. Will the Indian Muslims agree to shift these two mosque to a different place??? Had the offer is made on the claim at Babari it would not have been destroyed.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

FREE REPRINTS

 Unless otherwise noted, you can republish our articles for free. You just have to credit TwoCircles.net and link it back to us, and you can’t edit our material or sell it separately. (We're licensed under Creative Commons, which provides the legal details.). For publishing TwoCircles.net photos please contact info@twocircles.net.